1993
DOI: 10.1016/0141-5425(93)90009-n
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stress analysis of endosseous implants using the Boundary Integral Equation (BIE) method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

1995
1995
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It seems that of all the available morphometric techniques, BEM offers the advantage of eliminating arbitrary internal subdivisions because it uses information based on the outline of the structure under study, thus making the use of distinct anatomical landmark points within specific reference frames unnecessary (McAlarney, 1995). This is particularly useful for structures with inherent material homogeneity and potentially complicated shapes, such as dental implants (Wolfe, 1993), or in cases of shapes which change complexly over time, making the reproducibility of landmarks very difficult. The present review will deal only with FE analysis when applied to mechanical issues related to the jaws and their associated structures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It seems that of all the available morphometric techniques, BEM offers the advantage of eliminating arbitrary internal subdivisions because it uses information based on the outline of the structure under study, thus making the use of distinct anatomical landmark points within specific reference frames unnecessary (McAlarney, 1995). This is particularly useful for structures with inherent material homogeneity and potentially complicated shapes, such as dental implants (Wolfe, 1993), or in cases of shapes which change complexly over time, making the reproducibility of landmarks very difficult. The present review will deal only with FE analysis when applied to mechanical issues related to the jaws and their associated structures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Упрощается также взаимодействие между вычислительными программами и системами автоматизированного проектирования при описании поверхности конструкции. В задачах стоматологической биомеханики МГИУ использовался для анализа напряженного состояния соединения гладкого имплантата и костной ткани [17]. Сравнительный анализ применения МКЭ и МГИУ при исследовании напряженнодеформированного состояния имплантатов выполнен в работах [18][19].…”
Section: Introductionunclassified