2009
DOI: 10.1101/lm.1257509
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stress disrupts context-dependent memory

Abstract: Memory is facilitated when the retrieval context resembles the learning context. The brain structures underlying contextual influences on memory are susceptible to stress. Whether stress interferes with context-dependent memory is still unknown. We exposed healthy adults to stress or a control procedure before they learned an object-location task in a room scented with vanilla. Memory was tested 24 h later, either in the same or in a different context (unfamiliar room without the odor). Stress administered pri… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

10
42
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
10
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Specifically, a woman’s menstrual phase and the use of oral contraceptives can affect her cortisol response to stressors (Kajantie & Phillips, 2006). Excluding female participants reduces the variability in the cortisol data and is consistent with previous stress studies that have only used male participants (Abercrombie et al, 2003; de Quervain et al, 2003; Khalili-Mahani, Dedovic, Engert, Pruessner, & Pruessner, 2010; Maheu et al, 2004, 2005; Oei et al, 2007; Pruessner et al, 2008; Schwabe, Romer, et al, 2009). While moderate acute stress during consolidation appears to be optimal for later memory performance, the effects of mild acute stress during consolidation in humans is unknown.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Specifically, a woman’s menstrual phase and the use of oral contraceptives can affect her cortisol response to stressors (Kajantie & Phillips, 2006). Excluding female participants reduces the variability in the cortisol data and is consistent with previous stress studies that have only used male participants (Abercrombie et al, 2003; de Quervain et al, 2003; Khalili-Mahani, Dedovic, Engert, Pruessner, & Pruessner, 2010; Maheu et al, 2004, 2005; Oei et al, 2007; Pruessner et al, 2008; Schwabe, Romer, et al, 2009). While moderate acute stress during consolidation appears to be optimal for later memory performance, the effects of mild acute stress during consolidation in humans is unknown.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Another related possibility for the relatively low cortisol response is when we measured salivary cortisol levels following the MIST. Previous literature suggests that stress-induced cortisol responses are expected to be maximal 20 min after the stressor (Schwabe, Bohringer, & Wolf, 2009; Schwabe & Wolf, 2009; Schwabe et al, 2008). Thus, it is possible that we missed the maximal stress-induced cortisol response, as we took saliva samples directly after MIST completion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The hippocampus expresses both mineralocorticoid receptors and glucocorticoid receptors, the two receptor types that mediate glucocorticoid actions in the brain, at a very high density (de Kloet et al, 2005). Stress or glucocorticoid administration before learning reduces hippocampal long-term potentiation (Diamond et al, 2007), suppresses learning-related increases in hippocampal spine density (Diamond et al, 2006), and impairs hippocampus-dependent memory processes (McEwen, 1999;de Quervain et al, 2000de Quervain et al, , 2003Schwabe et al, 2009). Thus, we propose that stress impaired the hippocampus-dependent system and hence allowed the striatum-dependent system to control classification learning.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, participants were monitored by a rather cold and unsociable experimenter. The SECPT has been used in several studies as an efficient stress induction method that leads to significant elevations in autonomic arousal, salivary cortisol, and subjective stress ratings Schwabe, Böhringer, & Wolf, 2009). …”
Section: Stress Protocol and Control Conditionmentioning
confidence: 99%