2021
DOI: 10.21107/rekayasa.v14i2.10511
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stress Distribution Analysis of DKDT Tubular Joint in a Minimum Offshore Structure

Abstract: A marginal field defines as an oil and/or gas field that has a short production period, low proven reservoir, and could not be exploited using existing technology. As the demand for oil and gas keeps increasing, one of the solutions to tackle the issues is to build the modified platform which came to be more minimalist to conduct the oil and gas production in the marginal field. Naturally, the minimum offshore structures are cost less but low in redundancy, therefore, pose more risks. Although the study on the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Data needed for this study, namely platform data, geometry data and material properties of the DKT tubular joints, are based on [9]. The platform and the DKT connection are shown in Fig.…”
Section: Data and Global Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data needed for this study, namely platform data, geometry data and material properties of the DKT tubular joints, are based on [9]. The platform and the DKT connection are shown in Fig.…”
Section: Data and Global Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, the result from the global analysis is extracted, namely platform data, geometry data, and material properties of double KT tubular joints. The global analysis data used from the previous study by Noviyanti [2,12] with the detail DKT connection shown in Figure 3 and…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the stress distribution studied in uni-planar connections is not accurate in determining the stress distribution in multi-planar connections which is present in the majority of jacket structure joints. Then, some studies show that the variation of geometric parameters have influences to hotspot stress, which later influence the SCF [2,3]. The amount of SCF depends on the geometry of the joint, the type of loading, the size, and the type of weld [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the proposed SCF formula for two planar joints is still limited. Stress distribution along the weld toe for the DKT joints was analyzed by Noviyanti [12] and continues for SCF estimation for two planar DKT joints [13]. Other joint type, such as multiplanar DTY type was also studied [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%