2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2011.12.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stress distribution in dental prosthesis under an occlusal combined dynamic loading

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
33
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
4
33
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Overload can lead to bone resorption or fatigue failure of the implant, whereas, under loading of the bone may cause disuse atrophy and subsequent bone loss. In most FEA models, the bone-implant interface was assumed to be perfect, simulating 100% osseointegration [9]. The generation of high stress distribution or concentration in the bone should be avoided to achieve stable osteointegration for implant restoration.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Overload can lead to bone resorption or fatigue failure of the implant, whereas, under loading of the bone may cause disuse atrophy and subsequent bone loss. In most FEA models, the bone-implant interface was assumed to be perfect, simulating 100% osseointegration [9]. The generation of high stress distribution or concentration in the bone should be avoided to achieve stable osteointegration for implant restoration.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it is valuable to investigate the stress/strains in bone and their relation to different parameters of implant and bone. The optimization of the contact area between the bone and the implant can be an important factor in increasing the durability of the prosthesis [9].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The geometric modeling of the completely dentate mandible, however, is not a trivial task when one requires biological structures of high geometrical similarity, such as detailed tooth crowns and roots, the periodontal ligament, the temporomandibular joint, and articular cartilage. As a result, most previous studies utilized simplified mandibular models without refined biological structures [20,21]. Furthermore, the determination of appropriate boundary conditions is as critical as the recreation of precise geometry for finite element model validation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16 Although this model was not made of a cancellous bone, its modulus of elasticity was 2 GPa, which was close to the cancellous modulus of elasticity that is around 1.4 GPa. 18 This difference is less notable when compared with the cortical bone elasticity modulus (14 GPa). 18 Although no abutments were attached to the implants, it was reported that during the axial loading, the load transfer was very similar to these two cases, but only when an axial load was applied.…”
Section: Experimental Partmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…18 This difference is less notable when compared with the cortical bone elasticity modulus (14 GPa). 18 Although no abutments were attached to the implants, it was reported that during the axial loading, the load transfer was very similar to these two cases, but only when an axial load was applied. 15 The acquired results lead to the same conclusion.…”
Section: Experimental Partmentioning
confidence: 96%