2012
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)em.1943-7889.0000390
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stress Response of a Rubber Block under Vertical Loading

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4 for various aspect ratios and Poisson's ratios and our FEM results show negligible difference compared to the numerical results in (Yeoh et al, 2002) performed by ANSYS. Still, due to the discontinuous BCs and the non-uniform deformation around the edges (z ¼ 0; h and r ¼ aÞ, stress concentrations are expected and were observed both numerically (Imbimbo and De Luca, 1998;Suh, 2007;Yeoh et al, 2002) and experimentally (Gent et al, 1974;Sakai, 1995). Although stress singularities are not captured by Eqs.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 76%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…4 for various aspect ratios and Poisson's ratios and our FEM results show negligible difference compared to the numerical results in (Yeoh et al, 2002) performed by ANSYS. Still, due to the discontinuous BCs and the non-uniform deformation around the edges (z ¼ 0; h and r ¼ aÞ, stress concentrations are expected and were observed both numerically (Imbimbo and De Luca, 1998;Suh, 2007;Yeoh et al, 2002) and experimentally (Gent et al, 1974;Sakai, 1995). Although stress singularities are not captured by Eqs.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…It has also been noticed that the analytical models tend to overestimate the effective modulus when the shape factor, s ¼ a=ð2hÞ for solid disks, is large (e.g. >30) compared with experimental measurements (Anderson et al, 2004;Suh, 2007) and the cause is still unclear. Fig.…”
Section: Effective Modulusmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…If both surfaces are lubricated (no friction) the stress at the interfaces will be constant p = p 0 = F N /πR 2 and the change in the thickness ∆d (assuming linear elasticity) will be determined by p 0 = E∆d/d. However, if the rubber adhere (or is glued) to the upper surface with no-slip the situation may be very different [22,23]. If d > R the stress at the (lower) interface will again be nearly uniform and ∆d will be determined by p 0 = E eff ∆d/d where E eff > E but nearly identical to E. In the opposite limit of a very thin rubber disk, d << R, the pressure distribution at the bottom surface will be nearly parabolic p(r) ≈ 2p 0 [1 − (r/R) 2 ] (see Fig.…”
Section: Rubber Block Under Vertical Loadingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The shape factor S f (defined as the ratio of loaded area to total stress free area) plays an important role in the compression test [22]. Therefore, tests were performed with two different geometries of samples whose characteristics are reported in Table 1.…”
Section: Cyclic Compression Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%