2021
DOI: 10.1007/s40995-020-01033-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stress–Strength Reliability for the Generalized Inverted Exponential Distribution Using MRSS

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many authors have recently used likelihood and Bayesian estimation approaches to estimate R = P ( Y < X = x ) for various life testing schemes based on various distributions [ 25 – 31 ].…”
Section: Stress-strength Reliability Computationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many authors have recently used likelihood and Bayesian estimation approaches to estimate R = P ( Y < X = x ) for various life testing schemes based on various distributions [ 25 – 31 ].…”
Section: Stress-strength Reliability Computationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies about the GIE distribution were discussed by several researchers (for instance see [31][32][33][34][35]). Note that for , the CDF (Equation ( 3)) reduces to the IE distribution.…”
Section: Model Specification and The Reliability Of The Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The two data sets were first published by Bader and Priest [ 37 ]; and they reflected the GPA strength of single carbon fibers with lengths of 10 mm (Data Set I) and 10 mm (Data Set II), respectively, with sample sizes of n = 63 and m = 69. These data were analyzed previously by Hassan et al [ 38 ]. The following are the data sets: Data Set I (length of 10 mm): X ( n = 63): “1.901, 2.132, 2.203, 2.228, 2.257, 2.350, 2.361, 2.396, 2.397, 2.445, 2.454, 2.474, 2.518, 2.522, 2.525, 2.532, 2.575, 2.614, 2.616, 2.618, 2.624, 2.659, 2.675, 2.738, 2.740, 2.856, 2.917, 2.928, 2.937, 2.937, 2.977, 2.996, 3.030, 3.125, 3.139, 3.145, 3.220, 3.223, 3.235, 3.243, 3.264, 3.272, 3.294, 3.332, 3.346, 3.377, 3.408, 3.435, 3.493, 3.501, 3.537, 3.554, 3.562, 3.628, 3.852, 3.871, 3.886, 3.971, 4.024, 4.027, 4.225, 4.395, 5.020.” Data Set II (length of 20 mm): Y ( m = 69): “1.312, 1.314, 1.479, 1.552, 1.700, 1.803, 1.861, 1.865, 1.944, 1.958, 1.966, 1.997, 2.006, 2.021, 2.027, 2.055, 2.063, 2.098, 2.14, 2.179, 2.224, 2.240, 2.253, 2.270, 2.272, 2.274, 2.301, 2.301, 2.359, 2.382, 2.382, 2.426, 2.434, 2.435, 2.478, 2.490, 2.511, 2.514, 2.535, 2.554, 2.566, 2.57, 2.586, 2.629, 2.633, 2.642, 2.648, 2.684, 2.697, 2.726, 2.770, 2.773, 2.800, 2.809, 2.818, 2.821, 2.848, 2.88, 2.954, 3.012, 3.067, 3.084, 3.090, 3.096, 3.128, 3.233, 3.433, 3.585, 3.585.” …”
Section: Application Of Real Datamentioning
confidence: 99%