2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.2011.01670.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stressed, Not Frozen: The Federal Funds Market in the Financial Crisis

Abstract: We examine the importance of liquidity hoarding and counterparty risk in the U.S. overnight interbank market during the financial crisis of 2008. Our findings suggest that counterparty risk plays a larger role than does liquidity hoarding: the day after Lehman Brothers' bankruptcy, loan terms become more sensitive to borrower characteristics. In particular, poorly performing large banks see an increase in spreads of 25 basis points, but are borrowing 1% less, on average. Worse performing banks do not hoard liq… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

19
277
1
5

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 434 publications
(302 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
19
277
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…For the amount borrowed we find no evidence for a significant reduction in interbank borrowing unless we introduce borrower fixed effects and even then only after the ECB conducted the special refinancing operation. In fact, for the period immediately after the Lehman insolvency, we find an increase in the amount banks borrow on the interbank market which confirms the results of Afonso et al (2011) who show that the fed funds market in the United States was "stressed, but not frozen". We find that on Monday, 15 September banks pay on average 0.15 basis points more for liquidity than in the reference period.…”
supporting
confidence: 79%
“…For the amount borrowed we find no evidence for a significant reduction in interbank borrowing unless we introduce borrower fixed effects and even then only after the ECB conducted the special refinancing operation. In fact, for the period immediately after the Lehman insolvency, we find an increase in the amount banks borrow on the interbank market which confirms the results of Afonso et al (2011) who show that the fed funds market in the United States was "stressed, but not frozen". We find that on Monday, 15 September banks pay on average 0.15 basis points more for liquidity than in the reference period.…”
supporting
confidence: 79%
“…If a particular bank can always interact with the same counterparty to smooth out liquidity shock, it avoids costly counterparty search in a decentralized market but relies on the insurance mechanism of the relationship. This argument is also given by Cocco et al (2009) and Afonso et al (2011) who find that borrowers with higher liquidity shocks rely more on relationships to access liquidity and trade generally at more favorable prices.…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 77%
“…1 See Afonso, Kovner, and Schoar (2011), Afonso (2012), Ashcraft, McAndrews, and Skeie (2011), Ashcraft and Bleakley (2006), Ashcraft and Duffie (2007), Acharya and Merrouche (2010), Bartolini, Hilton and McAndrews (2010), McAndrews (2009), Bech and Atalay (2008), Bech and Klee (2009), and Allen, Chapmanz, Echenique, and Shum (2012) 2 One exception to this is the e-MID (electronic market for interbank deposits) active in Italy. See Angelini et al (2009) for more information.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%