Stressverarbeitungsfragebogen für Kinder und Jugendliche (SVF-KJ)

Hampel, Petra; Amtmann, Elfriede; Roch, Svenja; Karpinski, N.; Petermann, Franz

doi:10.1026/0012-1924/a000196

Cited by 12 publications

(27 citation statements)

References 27 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Assessment of Strengths Interests and Goals (Wallace et al, 2001); NEO-FFI, short version of the NEO Personality Inventory Five-Factor Inventory (Costa and McCrae, 1992); PTGI, Post-traumatic Growth Inventory (Tedeschi et al, 1996); SCQ, Social coping Questionnaire (Swiatek, 1995); SVF-120, German Stress-Coping-Questionnaires for adults (Janke et al, 1997); SVF-KJ German Stress-Coping-Questionnaires for adolescents (Hampel et al,2001); FKK, German competence and Control Beliefs Questionnaire (Krampen, 1991); BPRS-E, Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale Extended (Lukoff, Nuechterlein, & Ventura, 1986;Ventura, Green, Shaner, & Liberman, 1993); CCS, Cybernetic Coping Scale (Edwards & Baglioni, 1993); UCL, Utrecht's Coping List (Schreurs et al, 1993); MADRS, Montgomery…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Coping strategies in first‐episode psychosis: A systematic review

Aguileta

Vila‐Badia

Usall

et al. 2019

Early Intervention Psych

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aims: This paper reviews and discusses the published information on coping strategies in people with a first-episode psychosis (FEP). The objective is to update knowledge about coping strategies used by people with a FEP, to compare these strategies with those used by other mental disorders, and to examine the relationship between coping strategies and other variables in FEP.Method: A search was conducted using PsycINFO, MEDLINE and PSICODOC between 1995 and 2018 using the following terms: coping strategies or Adaptation, Psychological and FEP.Results: A total of 167 studies were found, of which 14 were selected for review. The results suggest the need for a multiple and integrated approach, since there are several factors that are involved in the coping strategies (eg, socio-demographic, clinical and psychological variables) used in the different profiles of psychotic spectrum, specifically in FEP. Conclusions:The role of coping skills is an important issue in psychopathological research in addition to clinical outcome, especially from the point of view of the patients, their social context and their recovery. Moreover, personalized therapies addressed to personal recovery should be considered to develop better coping specifically addressed to patients' needs.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Coping strategies in first‐episode psychosis: A systematic review

Aguileta

Vila‐Badia

Usall

et al. 2019

Early Intervention Psych

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Thus, each procedural knowledge scale (assessing one relevant sub-strategy) corresponds to a single item in the declarative knowledge scale. The procedural level measure consisted of items derived and adapted from renowned self-report questionnaire scales such as the LIST (Wild and Schiefele, 1994) and SVF-KJ (Coping questionnaire for children and adolescents; Hampel et al, 2001), as well as theory-based (e.g., Pekrun, 2006; Streblow and Schiefele, 2006) self-constructed items. The situation-specific strategies were validated via quantitative expert ratings ( N = 11) by renowned German-speaking scholars in the field of SRL research.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Knowledge vs. Action: Discrepancies in University Students' Knowledge about and Self-Reported Use of Self-Regulated Learning Strategies

et al. 2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

University students are supposed to be autonomous learners, able to adapt to an educational environment significantly less guided than school. Entering higher education poses a challenge of self-regulation, in which beginning students are often not prepared with self-regulation strategies needed. Since there are many studies assessing self-regulated learning (SRL) via classical self-reports, we know a lot about how students generally self-assess their SRL strategies. However, SRL and performance do not always correlate highly in these studies. The aim of the present study is to determine whether there are discrepancies between students' knowledge about SRL and their action in applying adequate SRL strategies in relevant learning situations. We also want to know whether such discrepancies generalize across domains and what the reasons for discrepancies are. The situation-specific Self-Regulated Learning Questionnaire for Action and Knowledge (SRL-QuAK) was used in a sample of 408 psychology and economic sciences students. Descriptive data analysis was conducted to determine potential discrepancies between SRL knowledge and action and differences between the study domains in an explorative way. The reasons for not using SRL-strategies were derived via qualitative content analysis. The results showed that although students had quite advanced knowledge of SRL strategies, they did not put this knowledge into action. This dissonance between SRL knowledge and action was found in both domains. In terms of reasons, students stated that they (a) lacked the time to use SRL strategies, (b) would not benefit from SRL strategies in the given situation, (c) would not be able to put the strategies to use effectively or (d) found it too arduous to use SRL strategies. The implications of these results will be discussed, e.g., the consequences for measures to overcome students' dissonance between knowledge and action and therefore to promote academic performance and well-being.

show abstract

“…Dysfunctional coping was assessed with five items of the Stress Coping Questionnaire for Children and Adolescents by Hampel et al44), which were rated on a 5-point scale (never–always; e.g., “When I am put under pressure by my mates or at school, I pretend that I am ill”). Catastrophizing was assessed with the German Pain Catastrophizing Scale for Children (PCS-C) 36.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Predicting the occurrence of headache and back pain in young adults by biopsychological characteristics assessed at childhood or adolescence

Kröner‐Herwig¹,

Gorbunova²,

Maas³

2017

AHMT

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The aim of the current study was to identify predictors of recurrent headache and back pain in young adults (aged 18–27 years) from data assessed in childhood or adolescence, i.e., 9 years before the final survey. Our interest was whether psychological characteristics contribute to the risk of pain prevalence in adult age when controlling for already empirically supported risk factors such as parental pain, pediatric pain and sex. The study was part of a five-wave epidemiological investigation of >5000 families with children aged between 7 and 14 years when addressed first. In a multiple hierarchical regression analysis, the abovementioned three variables (Block-I variables) were entered first followed by five psychological trait variables (Block-II variables: internalizing, anxiety sensitivity, somatosensory amplification, catastrophizing and dysfunctional stress coping) to find out the extent of model improvement. The multivariable hierarchical regression analysis confirmed the hypothesis that the Block-I variables significantly enhance the risk of future pain at young adult age. None of the psychological variables did so. Thus, the hypothesis of a significant surplus predictive effect was not confirmed. The amount of total explained variance differed strongly between headache and back pain. In particular, a valid prediction of back pain was not possible. When analyzed separately in simple regression analysis, psychological variables turned out to be significant predictors, however, of very low effect size. The inclusion of Block-I variables in the model clearly reduced the impact of the psychological variables. This risk profile is discussed in the context of the different trajectories of headache and back pain from childhood to adult age, which were proposed by various studies. We propose that a biopsychological characteristic denoted as emotional negativity, especially regarding self-reference, might be a common factor behind all selected variables. Risk research in recurrent pain is a field where much more multidisciplinary research is needed before progress can be expected.

show abstract

Stressverarbeitungsfragebogen für Kinder und Jugendliche (SVF-KJ)

Cited by 12 publications

References 27 publications

Coping strategies in first‐episode psychosis: A systematic review

Coping strategies in first‐episode psychosis: A systematic review

Knowledge vs. Action: Discrepancies in University Students' Knowledge about and Self-Reported Use of Self-Regulated Learning Strategies

Predicting the occurrence of headache and back pain in young adults by biopsychological characteristics assessed at childhood or adolescence

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About