2018
DOI: 10.1080/15592324.2018.1444322
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strigolactones are common regulators in induction of stomatal closure in planta

Abstract: Strigolactones (SLs) have been implicated in many plant biological processes, including growth and development and the acclimation to environmental stress. We recently reported that SLs intrinsically acted as prominent regulators in induction of stomatal closure. Here we present evidence that the effect of SLs on stotamal closure is not limited to Arabidopsis, and thus SLs could serve as common regulators in the modulation of stomatal apertures of various plant species. Nevertheless, TIS108, a SL-biosynthetic … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
44
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
2
44
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, although Bu et al () confirmed that max2 mutants are more sensitive to drought, they did not observe that the SL‐biosynthetic max1 , max3 , and max4 mutants exhibited drought‐sensitive phenotypes on soil upon withholding water for a period of 10 days when compared with WT. This result does not comply with what reported by C. V. Ha et al () and Y. Zhang et al (). It is possible that this discrepancy in drought‐related attributes can be explained by different growth conditions, seedling age, and different periods of exposure to drought.…”
Section: Implication Of Sls In Plant Responses and Adaptation To Droucontrasting
confidence: 94%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Interestingly, although Bu et al () confirmed that max2 mutants are more sensitive to drought, they did not observe that the SL‐biosynthetic max1 , max3 , and max4 mutants exhibited drought‐sensitive phenotypes on soil upon withholding water for a period of 10 days when compared with WT. This result does not comply with what reported by C. V. Ha et al () and Y. Zhang et al (). It is possible that this discrepancy in drought‐related attributes can be explained by different growth conditions, seedling age, and different periods of exposure to drought.…”
Section: Implication Of Sls In Plant Responses and Adaptation To Droucontrasting
confidence: 94%
“…The first evidence on the direct involvement of SLs in regulating the acclimatization of plants to drought and ABA‐mediated stomatal closure was reported in Arabidopsis (C. V. Ha et al, ). Specifically, the Arabidopsis SL‐biosynthetic max3 and max4 and the SL‐response max2 mutants were more drought‐susceptible than WT, which was further supported by water deficit‐hypersensitive responses of the Arabidopsis SL‐biosynthetic max1 mutant plants (Y. Zhang et al, ), and the SL‐depleted L. japonicus LjCCD7 ‐silenced and tomato SlCCD7 ‐silenced transgenic plants (Liu et al, ; Visentin et al, ). In addition, C. V. Ha et al () also observed that the leaves of the max2 , max3 , and max4 mutants subjected to dehydration lost more water in comparison with WT leaves.…”
Section: Implication Of Sls In Plant Responses and Adaptation To Droumentioning
confidence: 90%
See 3 more Smart Citations