2014
DOI: 10.1007/jhep07(2014)092
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

String theoretic QCD axions in the light of PLANCK and BICEP2

Abstract: The QCD axion solving the strong CP problem may originate from antisymmetric tensor gauge fields in compactified string theory, with a decay constant around the GUT scale. Such possibility appears to be ruled out now by the detection of tensor modes by BICEP2 and the PLANCK constraints on isocurvature density perturbations. A more interesting and still viable possibility is that the string theoretic QCD axion is charged under an anomalous U(1) A gauge symmetry. In such case, the axion decay constant can be muc… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 89 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the above constraints only apply when the PQ field Φ has the vacuum expectation value v(= F a N DW ) during inflation. As first pointed out by Linde [20,22,23,24,25], when the PQ field has a larger expectation value, the isocurvature perturbations are suppressed. The constraints are the most relaxed when the PQ field takes the Planck scale M p ( 2.4 × 10 18 GeV) during inflation.…”
Section: Isocuravture Perturbationsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…However, the above constraints only apply when the PQ field Φ has the vacuum expectation value v(= F a N DW ) during inflation. As first pointed out by Linde [20,22,23,24,25], when the PQ field has a larger expectation value, the isocurvature perturbations are suppressed. The constraints are the most relaxed when the PQ field takes the Planck scale M p ( 2.4 × 10 18 GeV) during inflation.…”
Section: Isocuravture Perturbationsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…For a given K and N , we plot in black contours the maximal allowed value of f a ≡ √ 2v a such that the contributions to the axion mass today due to explicit breaking do not disrupt the solution to the strong CP problem-i.e., both N and KN are sufficiently large that the U (1) PQ -breaking operators of Eq. (38) give small contributions to m 2 eff . As above, we implement strong CP 18 The quartic term can be neglected for λS 19 Similarly, we neglect terms such as |S| 2 S 2 .…”
Section: Additional U (1)pq Fieldsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Today, when |I| = 0 is assumed, vS ,0 = 0 is driven by the tadpole forS induced via the first term of Eq. (38) when v S,0 f S √ 2 . For instance, neglecting the terms with powers ofS greater than two, 18 The modification to the PQ potential required to enhance vS during inflation still risks destabilizing the inflaton potential.…”
Section: Additional U (1)pq Fieldsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…See also refs. [92][93][94] for recent discussion in this direction. The saxion coherent oscillation with an amplitude of ∼ f a remains in this case, but it is not cosmologically problematic [66].…”
Section: Jhep11(2014)151mentioning
confidence: 99%