Striving for excellence: the role of top management team diversity in universities

Abstract

If you would like to write for this, or any other Emerald publication, then please use our Emerald for Authors service information about how to choose which publication to write for and submission guidelines are available for all. Please visit www.emeraldinsight.com/authors for more information. About Emerald www.emeraldinsight.comEmerald is a global publisher linking research and practice to the benefit of society. The company manages a portfolio of more than 290 journals and over 2,350 books and book series volumes, as well as providing an extensive range of online products and additional customer resources and services.Emerald is both COUNTER 4 and TRANSFER compliant. The organization is a partner of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and also works with Portico and the LOCKSS initiative for digital archive preservation. AbstractPurpose -The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the influence of top management team diversity on academic excellence in universities. Academic excellence is conceptualized as successfully gaining funds for inter-organizational research collaborations, interdisciplinary graduate schools and high-ranked scientific reputation. Design/methodology/approach -The study applies upper echelon theory to universities. Three hypotheses are developed: (overall) top management team heterogeneity is positively associated with successful funding of excellence clusters, (overall) top management team heterogeneity is positively associated with successful funding of graduate schools and (overall) top management team heterogeneity is positively associated with academic reputation. The empirical study is based on a cross-sectional dataset with a time lag, covering characteristics of 75 German public universities from 2008 to 2013. Multiple-regression analysis is applied to test the hypotheses. Findings -Our results indicate that disciplinary and educational diversity of upper echelons has a positive effect on the outcomes. Other top management team characteristics (age, gender, etc.) show no significant effects. Besides top management team composition, we find that a high number of faculties and a broad inclusion of internal status groups (students, tenured faculty, academic and administrative staff) and external stakeholders in decision making processes may enhance academic excellence of universities. Research limitations/implications -First, the study contributes to the body of literature concerned with higher education. It is situated at the crossroads of management studies and higher education research, unlocking strategic management theorizing for the public context. Furthermore, the study contributes to the body of literature on strategic leadership in pluralistic organizations. It highlights the importance of heterogeneous governance structures and modular organization designs for achieving academic excellence. Practical implications -The paper may inform practitioners in administrative or leading positions and policy-makers concerned with higher education. The more diverse a top managem...

A systematic review of job-related diversity and future research directions

“…Researchers have also advocated that JRD dimensions enhance creative behavior (Choi, 2007), firm performance (Jiang et al. , 2010), and organizational innovation (Hattke and Blaschke, 2015) using a process-based approach. Further, the next section discusses the JRD dimensions (education, functional, and tenure diversity) in detail.…”

“…Using a process-based approach, JRD has been identified as a key driver of problem-solving , strategic decision-making (Kanadlı et al, 2018), team creativity (Shin and Zhou, 2007;Sung and Choi, 2019), and team innovations (Valls et al, 2016). Researchers have also advocated that JRD dimensions enhance creative behavior (Choi, 2007), firm performance (Jiang et al, 2010), and organizational innovation (Hattke and Blaschke, 2015) using a process-based approach. Further, the next section discusses the JRD dimensions (education, functional, and tenure diversity) in detail.…”

Governing Collective Action – The Impetus for University Commons

“…In addition, it prevents the professional board from reaching a level of detail in the knowledge that is essential for informed decision-making on which and how commons should be established 55 . This is the main reason why a professional board composed of accomplished scholars from a variety of disciplines is more successful in university leadership 56 57 The performance metrics and behaviour controls used by the board to bridge this cognitive and information asymmetry have side effects.…”

Pygmalion going international

“…There has recently been an increasing interest in studying the relationship between multiculturalism and team performance (Agrawal, 2012;Carson et al, 2004;Hattke and Blaschke, 2015;Yu and Cable, 2011), including in the Arabian Gulf (Forstenlechner, 2010;Khan et al, 2010). Yet, the research on the effects of cultural diversity on group work has so far been inconclusive (Gelfand et al, 2007).…”