2003
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9868.2004.00439.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strong Control, Conservative Point Estimation and Simultaneous Conservative Consistency of False Discovery Rates: A Unified Approach

Abstract: The false discovery rate (FDR) is a multiple hypothesis testing quantity that describes the expected proportion of false positive results among all rejected null hypotheses. Benjamini and Hochberg introduced this quantity and proved that a particular step-up "p"-value method controls the FDR. Storey introduced a point estimate of the FDR for fixed significance regions. The former approach conservatively controls the FDR at a fixed predetermined level, and the latter provides a conservatively biased estimate of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

16
1,418
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,207 publications
(1,434 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
16
1,418
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As this represents a substantial number of statistical analyses (84*4 = 336), we controlled for multiple comparisons. In specific, the analyses in this study utilize the false discovery rate (FDR) [14] paradigm for post-hoc hypothesis testing, using the method by Storey [34] in specific. This method produces a substitute or p-values, termed q-values, driven by controlling the proportion of false positives obtained via a set of tests.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As this represents a substantial number of statistical analyses (84*4 = 336), we controlled for multiple comparisons. In specific, the analyses in this study utilize the false discovery rate (FDR) [14] paradigm for post-hoc hypothesis testing, using the method by Storey [34] in specific. This method produces a substitute or p-values, termed q-values, driven by controlling the proportion of false positives obtained via a set of tests.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, we calculated the false discovery rate (FDR) 61 using the programme largeQvalue 62 . This programme implements the algorithms of refs [63][64][65] , and takes a set of P values and maps these onto q values. We chose a FDR of 0.01, resulting in a threshold of 2.8 × 10 −5 .…”
Section: Nature Ecology and Evolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in genetic association studies, most of the hypotheses are null (SNPs not associated with the disease). Moreover, FDR assumes that the P-values corresponding to true null hypothesis tests are independent and uniformly distributed or can be considered as approximately independent [Benjamini and Hochberg, 1995;Storey et al, 2004], which is likely to be violated when there is high LD among SNPs in genetic association studies. Therefore, we compared our method only to the permutation method which is considered as a gold standard in multiple testing correction, Bonferroni and Li and Ji's approach.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%