2016
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.93.195109
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strong correlations generically protectd-wave superconductivity against disorder

Abstract: We address the question of why strongly correlated d-wave superconductors, such as the cuprates, prove to be surprisingly robust against the introduction of non-magnetic impurities. We show that, very generally, both the pair-breaking and the normal state transport scattering rates are significantly suppressed by strong correlations effects arising in the proximity to a Mott insulating state. We also show that the correlation-renormalized scattering amplitude is generically enhanced in the forward direction, a… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A surprising result of RIMT [15,[26][27][28] is that in-spite of the d-wave nature of the order parameter, strong correlations make superconductivity robust up to moderate disorders. This is ascribed to the electronic repulsions that modify the hopping amplitudes based on local density and smear out charge accumulation near deep potential wells, leading to a much weaker effective disorder.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A surprising result of RIMT [15,[26][27][28] is that in-spite of the d-wave nature of the order parameter, strong correlations make superconductivity robust up to moderate disorders. This is ascribed to the electronic repulsions that modify the hopping amplitudes based on local density and smear out charge accumulation near deep potential wells, leading to a much weaker effective disorder.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A semianalytic approach, where effects of projection are kept in terms of renormalization of Hamiltonian parameters, is the Gutzwiller approximation [24], which is known [25] to match the more sophisticated Monte Carlo results [22] for the homogeneous system. This approach is easily extended to inhomogeneous situations to get a renormalized inhomogeneous mean field theory (RIMT) [15,[26][27][28], which tries to capture effects of both strong correlations and disorder in the system.A surprising result of RIMT [15,[26][27][28] is that in-spite of the d-wave nature of the order parameter, strong correlations make superconductivity robust up to moderate disorders. This is ascribed to the electronic repulsions that modify the hopping amplitudes based on local density and smear out charge accumulation near deep potential wells, leading to a much weaker effective disorder.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[15,16] By contrast, for non-magnetic disorder the s± superconducting state is largely immune to disorder, in agreement with earlier one-band studies, finding that correlations enhance the screening of disorder potentials and thereby reduce pair-breaking and scattering rates compared to the non-interacting case. [17][18][19][20][21] In the current multi-orbital case, however, additional impuritygenerated bound states play an important unexpected role in supporting T c . This resilience to non-magnetic disorder is remarkable since favorable clusters of impurities locally pin magnetic order, eventually causing a volume-full inhomogeneous magnetic state which coexists with superconductivity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…How may one understand this result which appears at odds with the expectation that correlations screen disorder and limit their damaging effects? [17][18][19][20][21] The answer to this question necessitates a deeper understanding of correlation effects at both the local scale (immediate vicinity of the impurity sites) and non-local scale (inter-impurity regions). Both effects are intimately tied to the fact that magnetic impurity moments induce spin polarizations of the surrounding itinerant electrons m iµ , which renormalize the exchange coupling such thatH imp =Ĩ iµσ σS iµ c † iµσ c iµσ , wherẽ…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%