2016
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.94.063407
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strong-field ionization and gauge dependence of nonlocal potentials

Abstract: Nonlocal potential models have been used in place of the Coulomb potential in the Schrodinger equation as an efficient means of exploring high field laser-atom interaction in previous works. Although these models have found use in modeling phenomena including photo-ionization and ejected electron momentum spectra, they are known to break electromagnetic gauge invariance. This paper examines if there is a preferred gauge for the linear field response and photoionization characteristics of nonlocal atomic bindin… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 25 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The problem of the gauge invariance in the context of nonlocal potentials has been discussed in great detail in various references. 9,17,18 In particular, it is shown in 9 that it is possible to formulate our separable potential model in various ways that can be grouped into two families such that within a given family, the length and velocity gauge formulations give the same value for the observables. This shows clearly the non-existence of a privileged gauge but does not solve the problem of the "global" gauge invariance since formulations belonging to the first and the second family give different results for the observables.…”
Section: Water Moleculementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The problem of the gauge invariance in the context of nonlocal potentials has been discussed in great detail in various references. 9,17,18 In particular, it is shown in 9 that it is possible to formulate our separable potential model in various ways that can be grouped into two families such that within a given family, the length and velocity gauge formulations give the same value for the observables. This shows clearly the non-existence of a privileged gauge but does not solve the problem of the "global" gauge invariance since formulations belonging to the first and the second family give different results for the observables.…”
Section: Water Moleculementioning
confidence: 99%