2008 18th International Conference on Electrical Machines 2008
DOI: 10.1109/icelmach.2008.4799877
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strong formulation using FDS, weak formulation using FEM and experimental data

Abstract: In this paper, the authors compare the numerical results obtained from a strong formulation using finite difference schemes (FDS) and a weak formulation using finite element method (FEM). The main purpose of our study is to know which method computes accurately the distribution of magnetic field in an experimental device. Numerical results are compared with a set of experimental data.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For details about the performed simulations and measurements see [24]. The distributions of (Ht) calculated from FEM and FDS, along the interface between air gap and the upper iron plate above the permanent magnet are shown on Figures 8.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…For details about the performed simulations and measurements see [24]. The distributions of (Ht) calculated from FEM and FDS, along the interface between air gap and the upper iron plate above the permanent magnet are shown on Figures 8.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fig. 7: Experimental set up used for measurements (3D view) [24] An experimental bench has been set up in order to compare the results obtained by finite element and by finite difference methods to the results of measurements. Figure 7 shows the experimental set up.…”
Section: A Treatment Of the Field Continuity Conditions On Interfacementioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations