2001
DOI: 10.1186/bf03500894
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strong selection in wheat populations during ten generations of dynamic management

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

2
26
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
26
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Here, we found that the dwarfing allele was associated with a reduction in fitness value because of between‐plant competition within the population, which led to the decrease in frequency over generations. This response illustrates the conflict between individual and group interests as described in a previous study on the same population (generations 1, 5 and 10, Goldringer et al . 2001), where negative within‐population correlations between plant height and number of kernel per plant were observed, together with positive between‐population correlation between the same traits.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Here, we found that the dwarfing allele was associated with a reduction in fitness value because of between‐plant competition within the population, which led to the decrease in frequency over generations. This response illustrates the conflict between individual and group interests as described in a previous study on the same population (generations 1, 5 and 10, Goldringer et al . 2001), where negative within‐population correlations between plant height and number of kernel per plant were observed, together with positive between‐population correlation between the same traits.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…In the entire genome. The mean genetic effective population size estimated between parents and G17, using the 21 loci located in the entire genome ( N eg = 167), was similar to the genetic effective population size estimated using restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) markers at a previous generation (G10, N eg = 144) (Goldringer et al . 2001), but was smaller than the demographic effective population size ( N ed = 2625) based on a minimum of 5000 plants grown at each generation and corrected for the inbreeding coefficient. …”
supporting
confidence: 53%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…(1999). Estimating the expected level of differentiation for two divergent populations with a demographic size of 2650 individuals (5000 plants per populations corrected for the mean inbreeding coefficient α = 0.9, Goldringer et al . 2001) evolving under genetic drift only during 12 generations gave also a smaller value of genetic differentiation (θ = 1 – e −t/2N = 0.002; Hedrick 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%