2007
DOI: 10.1002/nbm.1214
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strongly coupled versus uncoupled spin response to radio frequency interference effects: application to glutamate and glutamine in spectroscopic imaging

Abstract: It is well known that comparable radio frequency (RF) wavelengths and human head dimensions at high fields can lead to an inhomogeneous RF field when using standard RF transmission. However, the impact of RF inhomogeneity on potential differences in quantification between coupled and uncoupled spins at longer echo times has not been investigated thoroughly. The consequence of this RF interference on metabolite quantification in spectroscopic imaging at 4.7 T was investigated for the strongly coupled spin syste… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a result of this inhomogeneity, the excitation across the region of interest is variable and can affect quantification of spectra since the gain of acquired spectra is not at the prescribed nutation angle. Nonuniform B1 has been shown to affect the yield of coupled resonances [22] relative to singlet resonances. Adiabatic RF pulse design offers a possible solution to mitigate the effects of B1 inhomogeneity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result of this inhomogeneity, the excitation across the region of interest is variable and can affect quantification of spectra since the gain of acquired spectra is not at the prescribed nutation angle. Nonuniform B1 has been shown to affect the yield of coupled resonances [22] relative to singlet resonances. Adiabatic RF pulse design offers a possible solution to mitigate the effects of B1 inhomogeneity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although editing may provide complete differentiation between NAAG and NAA, the reliability is limited by low signal‐to‐noise ratio. B 1 inhomogeneity effects may be detrimental in editing, given that the effects of flip angle variations differ between coupled and uncoupled spin signals (13). The artifacts can be reduced using adiabatic pulses for volume localization (14).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result of the use of short TE, the effect of an inhomogeneous B 1 within the voxel (approximately 15–30% variation) on the evolution of J‐coupled resonances, reported by Snyder et al . 16, was considered to be negligible. Therefore, nominal flip angles were used in the simulation of the spectra.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%