2017
DOI: 10.1063/1.4983643
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural analysis of amorphous carbon films by spectroscopic ellipsometry, RBS/ERDA, and NEXAFS

Abstract: The structural analysis of amorphous carbon films is not only the premise of their unique properties applied in the industrial fields but also the indispensable element on their classification. In this letter, we refurbished the classification of amorphous carbon films based on the optical constants in terms of the refractive index (n) and the extinction coefficient (k). In the selected photon energy range, we defined the maximum of n (En-max) and k at a value more than 10−4 (Ek) to explore the relationship be… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

2
16
1
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
2
16
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to samples #01–08 and #09–16 were synthesized under the same conditions except for deposition time, only part samples were measured selectively. From the data analysis of pico‐indentation, XRR, RBS/ERDA, NEXAFS, and compare with their optical properties and the previous works, [ 4b,5,6 ] we found samples #01–#08 presented the density, hardness, hydrogen content, sp 3 ratio, n , and k , of ≈1.24 g cm −3 , less than 1.0 GPa (average value is 0.49 GPa), 43 at%, 0.42, 1.65, and 0.01 respectively, should be classified into PLC films; samples #09–#16 presented average value of density, hardness, hydrogen content, sp 3 ratio, n , and k , as ≈1.67 g cm −3 , 3.4 GPa, 26 at%, 0.28, 2.13, and 0.31, respectively, were classified into a‐C:H films. However, due to the various methods and different deposited conditions, samples #17–24, have the density, hardness, hydrogen content, sp 3 ratio, n , and k , distribute in the range of 1.78–3.12 g cm −3 , 12.1–37.2 GPa, 0.2–23 at%, 0.51–0.71, 2.18–2.73, and 0.04–0.74, respectively, they belong to the ta‐C (samples #20 and #21), or ta‐C:H (other samples).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 56%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Due to samples #01–08 and #09–16 were synthesized under the same conditions except for deposition time, only part samples were measured selectively. From the data analysis of pico‐indentation, XRR, RBS/ERDA, NEXAFS, and compare with their optical properties and the previous works, [ 4b,5,6 ] we found samples #01–#08 presented the density, hardness, hydrogen content, sp 3 ratio, n , and k , of ≈1.24 g cm −3 , less than 1.0 GPa (average value is 0.49 GPa), 43 at%, 0.42, 1.65, and 0.01 respectively, should be classified into PLC films; samples #09–#16 presented average value of density, hardness, hydrogen content, sp 3 ratio, n , and k , as ≈1.67 g cm −3 , 3.4 GPa, 26 at%, 0.28, 2.13, and 0.31, respectively, were classified into a‐C:H films. However, due to the various methods and different deposited conditions, samples #17–24, have the density, hardness, hydrogen content, sp 3 ratio, n , and k , distribute in the range of 1.78–3.12 g cm −3 , 12.1–37.2 GPa, 0.2–23 at%, 0.51–0.71, 2.18–2.73, and 0.04–0.74, respectively, they belong to the ta‐C (samples #20 and #21), or ta‐C:H (other samples).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 56%
“…[ 4b ] Figure 3c shows the typical RBS/ERDA spectrum of DLC film sample #05, the hydrogen content was got from the raw data profile fitting. [ 5,6,14 ] Figure 3d shows the typical carbon k ‐edge NEXAFS spectrum of DLC film sample #21, and curve‐fitting results. The sp 3 /(sp 2 + sp 3 ) ratio (sp 3 ratio) was calculated from the area ratio of blue curve and green curves, which is derived from the π–π* electronic excitation of carbon sp 2 electrons and the σ –σ * electronic excitation of carbon sp 2 and sp 3 electrons, after comparison with the standard materials of highly oriented pyrolytic graphite.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In part two, we refurbished the classification of amorphous carbon films based on the optical constants (n and k). In the selected photon energy range, we defined the maximum of n (E n-max ) and k at a value more than 10 −4 (E k ) to explore the relationship between the different classification schemes for amorphous carbon films deposited by different techniques [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Для моделирования плазмонных спектров гибридных структур необходимо знать дисперсию показателя преломления и коэффициента экстинкции всех компонент. Метод спектральной эллипсометрии [17] применялся для анализа оптических свойств различных форм аморфного углерода [18]. Красное смещение и уширение поло-сы поверхностного плазмонного резонанса в алмазоподобных пленках с включениями наночастиц серебра анализировались с помощью теории рассеяния Ми и теории эффективной среды Максвелла-Гарнетта [15].…”
unclassified