“…Due to samples #01–08 and #09–16 were synthesized under the same conditions except for deposition time, only part samples were measured selectively. From the data analysis of pico‐indentation, XRR, RBS/ERDA, NEXAFS, and compare with their optical properties and the previous works, [ 4b,5,6 ] we found samples #01–#08 presented the density, hardness, hydrogen content, sp 3 ratio, n , and k , of ≈1.24 g cm −3 , less than 1.0 GPa (average value is 0.49 GPa), 43 at%, 0.42, 1.65, and 0.01 respectively, should be classified into PLC films; samples #09–#16 presented average value of density, hardness, hydrogen content, sp 3 ratio, n , and k , as ≈1.67 g cm −3 , 3.4 GPa, 26 at%, 0.28, 2.13, and 0.31, respectively, were classified into a‐C:H films. However, due to the various methods and different deposited conditions, samples #17–24, have the density, hardness, hydrogen content, sp 3 ratio, n , and k , distribute in the range of 1.78–3.12 g cm −3 , 12.1–37.2 GPa, 0.2–23 at%, 0.51–0.71, 2.18–2.73, and 0.04–0.74, respectively, they belong to the ta‐C (samples #20 and #21), or ta‐C:H (other samples).…”