2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2014.12.157
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural and electronic properties of submonolayer-thick Sn films on Ru(0001)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
3
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The latter structure is significantly stabilized by 0.55 eV per Sn atom. Note that these structural models solely demonstrate that Sn cannot form ordered structures with all Sn atoms in the preferred hcp site, in agreement with the found reconstructions and three-dimensional growth beyond coverages of 1/2 ML. A full exploration of structural models for structures with such high Sn content would be required to fully understand this regime.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 65%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The latter structure is significantly stabilized by 0.55 eV per Sn atom. Note that these structural models solely demonstrate that Sn cannot form ordered structures with all Sn atoms in the preferred hcp site, in agreement with the found reconstructions and three-dimensional growth beyond coverages of 1/2 ML. A full exploration of structural models for structures with such high Sn content would be required to fully understand this regime.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 65%
“…This is due to significant X–X interactions that occur for coverages beyond 1/4 ML. In fact, it is known that Sn starts to form reconstructions for coverages ≥1/2 ML on top of ruthenium. We observe that the formation energy of Sn adatoms at coverages of 1/9–1/4 ML is almost constant. Thus, a coverage of 1/4 ML appears to be the threshold for isolated Sn adsorption.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…This coincides with the -rect structure reported from experiment 11,12 and first principles. 13 The atoms in the first layer show a large negative adsorption energy of −1.19 eV, per eqn (1) , with the energy of one β-Sn atom as the reference. For projected density of states of the Sn/Ru interface, see Supporting Information.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…We have also performed a comparison of diffusion barriers calculated with the CINEB algorithm, and it shows a large difference in mobility. The potential energy surface for Sn adsorbed on Ru is quite flat, 8,13 and the energy barrier for diffusion from one 3-fold site to the next is at most 0.13 eV on a clean Ru surface. This changes to 1.0 eV for Sn on an H-covered surface.…”
Section: Sn On H/rumentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation