2005
DOI: 10.1126/science.1106592
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural Basis of Energy Transduction in the Transport Cycle of MsbA

Abstract: We used site-directed spin-labeling and electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy to characterize the conformational motion that couples energy expenditure to substrate translocation in the multidrug transporter MsbA. In liposomes, ligand-free MsbA samples conformations that depart from the crystal structures, including looser packing and water penetration along the periplasmic side. Adenosine triphosphate (ATP) binding closes the substrate chamber to the cytoplasm while increasing hydration at the periplas… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

13
146
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 152 publications
(160 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
13
146
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These data were questioned as a detergent artifact mistaken for dynamic NBDs. DEER data of ABC transporters in liposomes and bicelles show broad lines for apo NBDs (Dong et al , 2005; Borbat et al , 2007; Zou et al , 2009; Bountra et al , 2017), further suggesting that in the absence of nucleotides the NBDs can have different degrees of disengagement. Upon nucleotide binding, the NBDs dimerize and display nearly identical distances across different transporters (Ward et al , 2007; Lin et al , 2015; Perez et al , 2015; Bountra et al , 2017).…”
Section: Discussion and Outlookmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These data were questioned as a detergent artifact mistaken for dynamic NBDs. DEER data of ABC transporters in liposomes and bicelles show broad lines for apo NBDs (Dong et al , 2005; Borbat et al , 2007; Zou et al , 2009; Bountra et al , 2017), further suggesting that in the absence of nucleotides the NBDs can have different degrees of disengagement. Upon nucleotide binding, the NBDs dimerize and display nearly identical distances across different transporters (Ward et al , 2007; Lin et al , 2015; Perez et al , 2015; Bountra et al , 2017).…”
Section: Discussion and Outlookmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All ABC transporters share a common architecture consisting of a transmembrane domain (TMD) for substrate recognition and transport, and a nucleotide‐binding domain (NBD) that converts the chemical energy of ATP into conformational changes for transport (Beis, 2015). The structures of several homodimeric (Dawson & Locher, 2006; Ward et al , 2007; Perez et al , 2015) and heterodimeric ABC transporters (Hohl et al , 2012; Noll et al , 2017) revealed distinct conformations and suggest, in combination with biophysical studies (e.g., EPR and NMR; Dong et al , 2005; Zou et al , 2009; Bountra et al , 2017; Timachi et al , 2017; Barth et al , 2018), that they undergo large conformational changes during transport. Their complex architecture is, however, a fundamental hurdle to fully understand the coupling between conformational changes, substrate binding, ATP binding and hydrolysis, and transport.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[16][17][18][19] High-resolution structures and NMR, EPR, and electron microscopy data strongly suggest that ABC exporters undergo large movements during substrate efflux, in particular upon ATP binding and/or hydrolysis. [20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27] Although structure determinations and the large body of experimental data obtained on ABC transporters have shed light on the transport mechanism, the answers to some questions remain elusive: what are the conformational changes occurring upon substrate binding and ATP binding and/or hydrolysis, and how do these changes relate to solute translocation? Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations are a means of exploring the conformational dynamics of proteins with an extreme level of detail as regards atomic motions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this purpose, spin label probes were introduced one at a time along the EmrE sequence (residues 3-110). EPR spectroscopy was used to characterize spin label dynamics, accessibility to the lipid and water phases, as well as pairwise short range proximity across the dimer interface (22)(23)(24)(25). Changes in the EPR constraints upon substrate binding reveal movements in TM1 and -2 and ordering of TM3 and the adjacent loop linking it to TM4.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%