1995
DOI: 10.1016/0925-9635(94)05283-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural changes in doped a-C:H films during annealing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
15
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This trend is agreement with the studies of Chiu and Tallant et al. 23,[30][31][32][33][34][35][36] Figure 3 displays the I D =I G ratio as a function of annealed temperature and compared to other papers. 23,31,32,37) It can be verified that the as-deposited DLCH film contains the diamond-like property due to its I D =I G ratio (1.72) is similar to reports from Ma (1.30), Sung (1.70), Sheeja (1.76) and Zhang (1.80), which are especially characterized on hardness performance.…”
supporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This trend is agreement with the studies of Chiu and Tallant et al. 23,[30][31][32][33][34][35][36] Figure 3 displays the I D =I G ratio as a function of annealed temperature and compared to other papers. 23,31,32,37) It can be verified that the as-deposited DLCH film contains the diamond-like property due to its I D =I G ratio (1.72) is similar to reports from Ma (1.30), Sung (1.70), Sheeja (1.76) and Zhang (1.80), which are especially characterized on hardness performance.…”
supporting
confidence: 81%
“…23,[30][31][32][33][34][35][36] Figure 3 displays the I D =I G ratio as a function of annealed temperature and compared to other papers. 23,31,32,37) It can be verified that the as-deposited DLCH film contains the diamond-like property due to its I D =I G ratio (1.72) is similar to reports from Ma (1.30), Sung (1.70), Sheeja (1.76) and Zhang (1.80), which are especially characterized on hardness performance. [38][39][40][41] The I D =I G ratio increases from 1.72 to 2.04 with increasing annealed temperature from asdeposited to 400 C with one significant variance at 300 C and this means that annealed DLCH starts to increase its disorder performance at this critical temperature, these values are consistent with the experimental result by Tallant, Oral and Tang et al [30][31][32][33][34][35][36] According to these characteristics, the annealed DLCH film has slight graphitization when heating up to 300 C, this critical temperature is in agreement with the study that thermal annealing treatment would lead to lose the hydrogen and result in the graphitization conversion for C-C sp 3 bonded carbon to transform to C-C sp 2 bonded carbon.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…26,27) Table 2 also implies that the DLCH is more stable and has slight graphitization when heating up to 300 C. This critical temperature is in agreement with the study that thermal annealing treatment would result in the conversion from amorphous carbon into graphite and soften the DLCH structure. [7][8][9] …”
Section: Contact Angle Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The combination of PI's residual tensile stress and thermal annealing relief effect on DLCH film can partially release some DLCH's residual compressive stress. [7][8][9] Adhesion strength can be evaluated by using the crosscut tool and tape test method. The results show a white and small area, which indicates the crosscut paths for remained DLCH surface due to PI film have been scratched out.…”
Section: Residual Stressmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation