1990
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.42.3644
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural complexity in grain boundaries with covalent bonding

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
19
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
3
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this case, bond distortion and the presence of dangling bonds have the potential to generate electronic states in the band gap since these effects tend to diminish or vanish the splitting between the bonding and antibonding states. In practice, it has been reported that bond disorder induces highly localized electronic states around the top of the valence band and the bottom of the conduction band for tilt and twist boundaries in Si, Ge, and SiC, 62,[68][69][70][71] and that such electronic states can be deep in the band gap when bond distortion is large and/or dangling bonds are present. [68][69][70][71] For ZnO, its ionicity should make the valence and conduction bands consist of the interactions among like atoms in addition to the interactions between Zn and O atoms.…”
Section: B Electronic Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this case, bond distortion and the presence of dangling bonds have the potential to generate electronic states in the band gap since these effects tend to diminish or vanish the splitting between the bonding and antibonding states. In practice, it has been reported that bond disorder induces highly localized electronic states around the top of the valence band and the bottom of the conduction band for tilt and twist boundaries in Si, Ge, and SiC, 62,[68][69][70][71] and that such electronic states can be deep in the band gap when bond distortion is large and/or dangling bonds are present. [68][69][70][71] For ZnO, its ionicity should make the valence and conduction bands consist of the interactions among like atoms in addition to the interactions between Zn and O atoms.…”
Section: B Electronic Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In practice, it has been reported that bond disorder induces highly localized electronic states around the top of the valence band and the bottom of the conduction band for tilt and twist boundaries in Si, Ge, and SiC, 62,[68][69][70][71] and that such electronic states can be deep in the band gap when bond distortion is large and/or dangling bonds are present. [68][69][70][71] For ZnO, its ionicity should make the valence and conduction bands consist of the interactions among like atoms in addition to the interactions between Zn and O atoms. If the former feature dominates, bond distortion and the presence of dangling bonds do not necessarily induce electronic states in the band gap: the localized electronic states associated with the bond disorder should tend to form within the valence or conduction band.…”
Section: B Electronic Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The existence of the large number of energy minima found in our simulations for a low-angle shear boundary resembles the phenomenon Energy of the supercell (with respect to the minimum energy structure) with a shear boundary depending on an atomic configuration of the intersection S2. In the column for coordination defects, the numbers of three-coordinated (dangling bond (DB)) or five-coordinated defects (floating bond (FB)) defects in the intersection are listed previously reported for a high-angle (001) S 5 twist boundary in Ge [16] and Si [17]. However, in the last case the degeneracy was associated with different translational states of the twist boundary.…”
Section: Discussion Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The ability of this method to describe the energetics and thermodynamics at finite temperatures when coupled with Monte Carlo techniques has been demonstrated in Refs. [21][22][23][24]. The crux of the effective Hamiltonian method is to perform the computations over a reduced set of degrees of freedom associated with the system under investigation.…”
Section: Effective Grain Boundary Hamiltonianmentioning
confidence: 99%