Tandem fluorescent protein timers (tFTs) report on protein age through time-dependent change in color, which can be exploited to study protein turnover and trafficking. Each tFT, composed of two fluorescent proteins (FPs) that differ in maturation kinetics, is suited to follow protein dynamics within a specific time range determined by the maturation rates of both FPs. So far, tFTs have been constructed by combining slower-maturing red fluorescent proteins (redFPs) with the faster-maturing superfolder green fluorescent protein (sfGFP). Toward a comprehensive characterization of tFTs, we compare here tFTs composed of different faster-maturing green fluorescent proteins (greenFPs) while keeping the slower-maturing redFP constant (mCherry). Our results indicate that the greenFP maturation kinetics influences the time range of a tFT. Moreover, we observe that commonly used greenFPs can partially withstand proteasomal degradation due to the stability of the FP fold, which results in accumulation of tFT fragments in the cell. Depending on the order of FPs in the timer, incomplete proteasomal degradation either shifts the time range of the tFT toward slower time scales or precludes its use for measurements of protein turnover. We identify greenFPs that are efficiently degraded by the proteasome and provide simple guidelines for the design of new tFTs.
INTRODUCTIONFluorescent proteins (FPs) become fluorescent only upon correct folding of the polypeptide and formation of the fluorophore through a series of chemical reactions within the β-barrel fold. This maturation process takes place on time scales from minutes to hours, depending on the FP and the environment (Tsien, 1998;Shaner et al., 2005). The time delay between protein synthesis and completion of the maturation process is exploited in tandem fluorescent protein timers (tFTs) to measure the dynamics of various cellular processes (Khmelinskii et al., 2012). A tFT is a fusion of two FPs that differ in maturation kinetics and spectral properties (i.e., color)-for example, a slower-maturing red fluorescent protein (redFP) and a fastermaturing green fluorescent protein (greenFP; Figure 1A). The greenFP is typically selected to be as rapidly maturing as possible and thus reports on protein localization and abundance. Because of the difference in maturation kinetics between the greenFP and redFP moieties, the color of a tFT (defined as the redFP/greenFP ratio of fluorescence intensities) changes over time ( Figure 1A). When a tFT is fused to a protein of interest, its color provides a measure of protein age that can be used to follow protein degradation, trafficking, and segregation during cell division (Khmelinskii et al., 2012).The range of protein ages that can be analyzed with a tFT, that is, its time range, is strongly influenced by the maturation kinetics of the slower-maturing FP in the pair (Khmelinskii et al., 2012). Therefore, in the tFTs described thus far (Khmelinskii et al., 2012;Khmelinskii and Knop, 2014;Dona et al., 2013), different slowermaturin...