2005
DOI: 10.1007/11527503_79
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural Damage Detection by Integrating Independent Component Analysis and Support Vector Machine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this system, the excitation and vibration of the bridge are the input and output of the system, respectively. They seem to be related, but actually they are statistically independent, as verified by many research results . We calculate the power value to check which signal is the most powerful and can represent the bridge's vibration.…”
Section: Bridge Damage Diagnosis Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this system, the excitation and vibration of the bridge are the input and output of the system, respectively. They seem to be related, but actually they are statistically independent, as verified by many research results . We calculate the power value to check which signal is the most powerful and can represent the bridge's vibration.…”
Section: Bridge Damage Diagnosis Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Most of the existing methods can be classified into two groups: model‐based and feature‐based. Model‐based methods are model updating procedures in which the structure's physical parameters, such as modal properties (e.g., mode shapes, natural frequencies and damping ratios), are calibrated and updated using measured data . A fundamental difficulty with these methods is that physical parameters obtained from the updating procedure may be unrelated to the actual damage scenarios (location and severity), although they can be consistent with the measured modal data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Zang et al [27] evaluated a combination of ICA extraction and artificial neuronal networks (ANN) for damage detection. Song et al [28] presented an approach that integrated the calculation of the independent components (ICs) to extract features with the information of the damage level and type, and a support vector machine classifier to detect damage. Senguler et al [29] used ICA for feature extraction and wavelet packet decomposition for monitoring the incipient bearing damage in electrical motors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the optimization ability of the intelligent algorithms, these methods can simulate measured parameters and then determine the finite element (FE) model that can reflect the actual structure condition, which enables these methods to identify the locations and degrees of damage accurately. Damage detection methods have been reported to use algorithms, including the artificial neural network (ANN) (Wu et al, 1992;Parka et al, 2009), support vector machine (SVM) (Song et al, 2006;He and Yan, 2007), and genetic algorithm (GA) (Mares and Surace, 1996;He and Hwang, 2006;Gomes and Silva, 2008;Vakil-Baghmisheh et al, 2008;Meruane and Heylen, 2011). However, the ANN and SVM require neutral training, in which a large amount of data is demanded.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%