2002
DOI: 10.1006/jmre.2002.2529
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural Determination of Spin Label Immobilization and Orientation: A Monte Carlo Minimization Approach

Abstract: Electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) is often used in the study of the orientation and dynamics of proteins. However, there are two major obstacles in the interpretation of EPR signals: (a) most spin labels are not fully immobilized by the protein, hence it is difficult to distinguish the mobility of the label with respect to the protein from the reorientation of the protein itself; (b) even in cases where the label is fully immobilized its orientation with respect to the protein is not known, which prevents … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
62
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
62
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This results in flexibility of the spin label, and uncertainty of its position due to rotamer diversity. To evaluate whether the wide distance distributions were due solely to rotamer diversity and spin-label flexibility, we performed molecular modeling using Metropolis Monte Carlo minimization (MMCM) (15,16), which can find the lowest energy rotamer (i.e., the most probable conformation) within the constraints of a local structure. Using the coordinates from the Wendt model, the most probable rotamer conformations for MTSSL on the RLC were found for each of the labeled sites (Table S2 and Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This results in flexibility of the spin label, and uncertainty of its position due to rotamer diversity. To evaluate whether the wide distance distributions were due solely to rotamer diversity and spin-label flexibility, we performed molecular modeling using Metropolis Monte Carlo minimization (MMCM) (15,16), which can find the lowest energy rotamer (i.e., the most probable conformation) within the constraints of a local structure. Using the coordinates from the Wendt model, the most probable rotamer conformations for MTSSL on the RLC were found for each of the labeled sites (Table S2 and Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The conformational space available to MTSSL on the cryo-EM structure of a chicken gizzard SMM fragment in the uP state [Protein Data Bank (PDB) ID code 1I84, (9)] was determined using MMCM algorithms (15,16). The structure of the RLC was homology built (Modeller) using the smooth RLC sequence and skeletal RLC (PDB ID code 2MYS) aligned to the Ca 2þ -trace of the RLC in 1I84.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Parameters for IPSL and MSL were based on CHARMM19 united-atom force fields (22). Metropolis Monte Carlo minimization (22,44) was used to determine starting points for MD simulations. MD simulations were carried out essentially as described previously (21, 25) (see also SI Text).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The structures were energy minimized in CHARMM using the CHARMM19 force field and used as the starting structures for modification with spin labels. A Monte Carlo routine implemented in CHARMM was used to search the conformational space of the spin label at each labeled site (32). The Lee and Richards rolling probe method implemented in the program SURFCV (33) was used to predict side chain solvent accessibility.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%