“…As compared with the InN nanowires, the intensity of the emission band of the microcrystallites is slightly strengthened, while the maximum of the emission band exhibits a significant blue-shifting from 665 to 570 nm. In recent years, reports about the optical band gap of InN have provoked fierce debate, for they showed different values from 0.6 to 2.2 eV. ,,,, Currently, theoretical calculations and experimental results indicate that the intrinsic band gap of InN is ∼0.65 eV. − The PL properties of InN materials affected by their shape and size, as well as the synthetic process and parameters, have been widely reported. − The quantum confinement effect, oxygen impurities, strain effect, the defects including N antisite (N In ), In antisite (In N ), N vacancy (V N ), In vacancy (V In ), and a complex defect (N In +In N ), or the Moss–Burstein shift induced by high electron concentrations of the InN nanostructures have been proposed as possible reasons for an increased band gap of InN. ,,,,− Recent reports showed that the major reason for the larger band gap of InN is the influence of oxygen inclusion. − Davydov et al showed that an InN sample containing ∼20% of oxygen has a band gap in the region of 1.8–2.1 eV . And Yoshimoto et al reported that, with the values of oxygen molar fractions in a series of polycrystalline InN layers changed from 1% to 6%, the associated band gap increased from 1.55 to 2.27 eV .…”