2007
DOI: 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2007.00028.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural genomics and drug discovery

Abstract: Structure determination has already proven useful for lead optimization and direct drug design. The number of high-resolution structures available in public databases today exceeds 30,000 and will definitely aid in structure-based drug design. Structural genomics approaches covering whole genomes, topologically similar proteins or gene families are great assets for further progress in the development of new drugs. However, membrane proteins representing 70% of current drug targets are poorly characterized stru… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
52
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 107 publications
(123 reference statements)
0
52
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The significance of membrane proteins that constitute ϳ25% of genomic sequences (19) is not reflected in the number of membrane structures that are currently available in the Protein Data Bank. Yet membrane proteins represent 70% of current drug targets (60). Specific lipid-binding residues may therefore also present a yet unexplored area for drug targeting.…”
Section: Implications Of Results On the Functioning Of Membranementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The significance of membrane proteins that constitute ϳ25% of genomic sequences (19) is not reflected in the number of membrane structures that are currently available in the Protein Data Bank. Yet membrane proteins represent 70% of current drug targets (60). Specific lipid-binding residues may therefore also present a yet unexplored area for drug targeting.…”
Section: Implications Of Results On the Functioning Of Membranementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even though the number of structures in the PDB has been increasing over the last ten years, partially thanks to structural genomics initiatives aimed to accelerate the characterization of unknown representative structures [25,26], the gap between annotated sequences and 3D protein M A N U S C R I P T A C C E P T E D ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT structures is still very large, mainly due to the progress in DNA sequencing technology [27]. This gap is actually even larger when considering the level of redundancy within the PDB, and the underrepresentation of certain families such as membrane proteins, in spite of the recent impressive achievements to solve structures for ~30 different G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) [28,29].…”
Section: In Silico Target Models In Structure-based Virtual Screeningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This can facilitate other research efforts in the field of protein structures including drug development, functional analyses and antibody development (Skolnick et al , 2000; Lundstrom, 2006a, 2007; Weigelt, 2010). …”
Section: Commentarymentioning
confidence: 99%