2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.mlwa.2021.100190
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural health monitoring of exterior beam–column subassemblies through detailed numerical modelling and using various machine learning techniques

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using optimization algorithms to make up for the defects of a single ML algorithm and to achieve efficient and accurate structural health monitoring has become a research hotspot. Guoqing Gui et al showed that the three optimized SVM methods can realize the accurate health monitoring of civil engineering structures, and their sensitivity, accuracy, and effectiveness are significantly better than traditional SVM methods [15], Giuseppe Santarsiero et al proposed an artificial neural network (ANN) optimized by particle swarm optimization (PSO) which can monitor the performance of reinforced concrete structures effectively [16]. Although many effective methods have been proposed in the field of bridge structural damage identification, most of these methods need to rely on professional equipment or laboratories, the cost of which is unaffordable for less-developed regions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using optimization algorithms to make up for the defects of a single ML algorithm and to achieve efficient and accurate structural health monitoring has become a research hotspot. Guoqing Gui et al showed that the three optimized SVM methods can realize the accurate health monitoring of civil engineering structures, and their sensitivity, accuracy, and effectiveness are significantly better than traditional SVM methods [15], Giuseppe Santarsiero et al proposed an artificial neural network (ANN) optimized by particle swarm optimization (PSO) which can monitor the performance of reinforced concrete structures effectively [16]. Although many effective methods have been proposed in the field of bridge structural damage identification, most of these methods need to rely on professional equipment or laboratories, the cost of which is unaffordable for less-developed regions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, with the continuous development of artificial intelligence technology, many scholars have applied artificial neural networks in engineering structure prediction or structural material research [16][17][18][19][20][21][22] with rich results. Liu et al [23] established a BP neural network prediction model for blast safe vibration velocity of newly cast concrete structures based on BP neural network theory and selected key influencing factors such as Poisson's ratio, and predicted the blast safe vibration velocity of concrete at different ages under two different conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides the experimental studies for developing knowhow about the influence of various input parameters on the structural performance, soft computing (SC)/machine learning (ML)/(AI)/techniques are gaining popularity nowadays, because of their ability to learn from training data so as to formulate a trained algorithm which can be used for accurate prediction of the output(s) [ 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 ]. The accuracy of a typical AI model depends on the number of data points used during the training process and the selection of influential input variables (i.e., high Pearson correlation value).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A literature survey reveals successful application of different AI techniques, such as ANN, GEP and ANFIS alongside the combination of meta-heuristic optimization algorithms and ML algorithms for predicting the mechanical performance of concrete as well as soils [ 24 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 ]. However, the ANN and ANFIS provide lesser insight about the models pertaining to their practical implications, e.g., to derive an empirical relation between the input parameters and output(s), which can further be used for predicting the output(s) and performing parametric and sensitivity analysis [ 40 , 41 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%