2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2020.107472
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural health monitoring with non-linear sensor measurements robust to unknown non-stationary input forcing

Abstract: Bayesian filtering based structural health monitoring algorithms typically assume stationary white Gaussian noise models to represent an unknown input forcing. However, typical structural damages occur mostly under the action of extreme loading conditions, like earthquake or high wind/waves, which are characteristically non-stationary and non-Gaussian. Clearly, this invalidates this basic assumption, causing these algorithms to perform poorly under non-stationary noise conditions. This paper extends an existin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Focusing on joint state-parameter estimation, JEKF has been established as an efficient method to estimate the state and the augmented health parameters (HIs) simultaneously. At the expense of a higher computational cost, this method has been improved upon by decoupling the estimation approaches [7,[18][19][20], but traditional joint estimation approach is still impelling for handling systems of moderate dimension, because of its excellent computational performance.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Focusing on joint state-parameter estimation, JEKF has been established as an efficient method to estimate the state and the augmented health parameters (HIs) simultaneously. At the expense of a higher computational cost, this method has been improved upon by decoupling the estimation approaches [7,[18][19][20], but traditional joint estimation approach is still impelling for handling systems of moderate dimension, because of its excellent computational performance.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This re‐centring is actually a second step evolution in which particles are pushed towards the particle mean. For this, the same evolution strategy is adopted, as has been adopted in Sen et al 18,55 and is reproduced here as ξkj=αξkj+false(1αfalse)trueξ¯k1, where trueξ¯k1 denotes the particle mean of the parameters till time step false(k1false) and ξkj denotes the shifted position for the particle. For detailed evolution strategy, readers may refer Sen et al 18 These particles are further employed to define the system matrices boldFk, boldBk, and boldEk, and the KF can then be employed to estimate the response states.…”
Section: System Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This re-centring is actually a second step evolution in which particles are pushed towards the particle mean. For this, the same evolution strategy is adopted, as has been adopted in Sen et al 18,55 and is reproduced here as…”
Section: Interacting Filtering Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Further, few example cases of damages in both the real structure and its numerical replica are performed with frequencies comparison ( Table 3 , Table 4 , Table 5 ). The resulting data can be employed for validating damage detection approaches [ 3 , 5 , 6 ]. All details pertaining to the real experiment and modeling have been vividly demonstrated in the following.…”
Section: Data Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%