49th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC) 2010
DOI: 10.1109/cdc.2010.5717922
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural identification of unate-like genetic network models from time-lapse protein concentration measurements

Abstract: We consider the problem of learning dynamical models of genetic regulatory networks from time-lapse measurements of gene expression. In our previous work [1], we described a method for the structural and parametric identification of ODE models that makes use of concurrent measurements of concentrations and synthesis rates of the gene products, and requires the knowledge of the noise statistics. In this paper we assume all these pieces of information are not simultaneously available. In particular we propose ex… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In other words, the promoter activities are the output of a computational procedure taking the approximate experimental curves as input. By contrast, direct methods like those used in WellInverter work the other way around; they treat the promoter activity as the input giving rise to an observed output, the fluorescence time-series data [1820, 22]. This has the conceptual advantage of allowing smoothing to be defined as a regularized data fitting problem on the quantity to be estimated, the promoter activity, and leads to robust results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other words, the promoter activities are the output of a computational procedure taking the approximate experimental curves as input. By contrast, direct methods like those used in WellInverter work the other way around; they treat the promoter activity as the input giving rise to an observed output, the fluorescence time-series data [1820, 22]. This has the conceptual advantage of allowing smoothing to be defined as a regularized data fitting problem on the quantity to be estimated, the promoter activity, and leads to robust results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, varying of gene copy number with time (e.g., due to kinetics of plasmid division) should be accounted for by both experiments and theoretical models. A particular challenge would be to reconstruct regulatory networks from sole protein dynamics data, that are becoming more and more available [35]. Development of advanced theoretical methods for such reconstruction, analogous to those for reverse engineering of gene networks from gene expression data, may thus become a necessity in the future.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the fluorescence and absorbance measurements are only indirectly related to promoter activities and protein concentrations, requiring dynamical models of the expression of reporter genes for their interpretation. Several methods have been proposed to process the fluorescence and absorbance signals and estimate time-varying promoter activities and protein concentrations from the data ( Aïchaoui et al , 2012 ; Bansal et al , 2012 ; de Jong et al , 2010 ; Finkenstädt et al , 2008 ; Leveau and Lindow, 2001 ; Lichten et al , 2014 ; Porreca et al , 2010 ; Ronen et al , 2002 ; Wang et al , 2008 ). The methods differ in the scope of the estimation problems considered, some being restricted to the inference of promoter activities and others also considering mRNA and protein concentrations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We formulate the estimation problems in the classical framework of regularized linear inversion ( Bertero, 1989 ; de Nicolao et al , 1997 ; Wahba, 1990 ), which gives access to a range of powerful tools for robust estimation. Contrary to the related work of Bansal et al (2012) and Porreca et al (2010) , we consider not only the inference of promoter activities, but also of growth rates and protein concentrations. Moreover, no restrictions are imposed that limit the practical applicability of the approach.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%