Structural Influences on Involvement in European Homegrown Jihadism: A Case Study

Abstract

This article empirically assesses the applicability of structural-level hypotheses for involvement in terrorism within the context of European homegrown jihadism. It uses these hypotheses to study how structural factors influenced involvement in the Dutch "Hofstadgroup." Structural factors enabled the group's emergence and its participants' adoption of extremist views. They also motivated involvement in political violence and a shift in some participants' focus from joining Islamist insurgents overseas to committing terrorism in the Netherlands. Finally, structural factors precipitated an actual terrorist attack. No support is found for the frequently encountered argument that discrimination and exclusion drive involvement in European homegrown jihadism. Instead, geopolitical grievances were prime drivers of this process.

Conducting Qualitative Research on Terrorism: Finding and Using Primary Sources

“…To be clear, the use of primary sources in terrorism research appears to have improved considerably over the past several years (Schuurman, 2018). But these critical observations about the field held true for the specific case of the Hofstadgroup, where relatively few authors had managed to study the group using the greater detail and reliability that first-hand sources offer.…”

The scope and limits of combatting violent extremism in the United Kingdom

“…Analysis of social media from the Islamic State challenges the assumption that religious narratives encourage vulnerable young people to turn to violent Islamist radicalisation to generate answers to their worldly exertions. Less than ten per cent of its output referred to religion alone (Schuurman et al, 2016). Rather, the likes of Islamic State focused on grievances, which are rooted in the experience of Muslims in the West and the East.…”

Implementing ‘Prevent’ in countering violent extremism in the UK: A left-realist critique

“…Certainly, analysis of social media from Islamic State challenges the assumption that religious narratives encourage vulnerable young people to turn to violent Islamist radicalisation to generate answers to their worldly exertions. Less than 10% of Islamic State output referred to religion alone (Schuurman et al, 2016). Rather, the likes of Islamic State concentrated on grievances, which are rooted in the experience of Muslims in the West (and in the East).…”