2007
DOI: 10.3327/jnst.44.64
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural Integrity Confirmation of a Once-through Steam Generator from the Viewpoint of Flow Instability

Abstract: Helically-coiled once-through steam generators have been utilized for an integral type reactor showing several benefits such as high quality steam generation, geometric compactness, and compensation for a thermal expansion. Steam generator operations with unstable two-phase flow conditions on the tube-side may cause degradation of the tube materials and curtail the lifetime of the component. Based on existing experimental results for a once-through steam generator, its structural integrity was confirmed from t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 6 publications
(3 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The minimum orifice length ranges from 183.8 mm to 198.9 mm for 100% power level, and from 285.1 mm to 288.0 mm for 20% power level. As expected, the low power level results in a higher minimum orifice length because flow instability tends to be more severe at a low feedwater flow rate [6] and this accordingly brings forth a higher orifice loss coefficient [4]. Thus, the secondary coolant flow rate for the minimum power level should be chosen as the orifice design condition; this implies that the orifice length is determined by the lowest power level considered in plant power operation.…”
Section: Otsg Performancementioning
confidence: 85%
“…The minimum orifice length ranges from 183.8 mm to 198.9 mm for 100% power level, and from 285.1 mm to 288.0 mm for 20% power level. As expected, the low power level results in a higher minimum orifice length because flow instability tends to be more severe at a low feedwater flow rate [6] and this accordingly brings forth a higher orifice loss coefficient [4]. Thus, the secondary coolant flow rate for the minimum power level should be chosen as the orifice design condition; this implies that the orifice length is determined by the lowest power level considered in plant power operation.…”
Section: Otsg Performancementioning
confidence: 85%