2016 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/asonam.2016.7752256
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural measures of clustering quality on graph samples

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Two metrics have been included in the methodology: entropy and purity , which indicates how different regions are distributed inside the same cluster [42].…”
Section: Metrics For Data Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two metrics have been included in the methodology: entropy and purity , which indicates how different regions are distributed inside the same cluster [42].…”
Section: Metrics For Data Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the synthetic graphs in which the ground-truth is already known, we utilize supervised quality metrics (i.e., δ-precison and δ-recall) proposed in [30] and normalized mutual information (NMI) [16] to measure the clustering results by using the ground-truth information. Higher value of δ-precision means that the obtained clusters in Ω are more precisely representative of the ground truth in G while higher value of δ-recall indicates the ground truth in G are more successfully covered by the obtained clusters in Ω.…”
Section: Quality Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Maiya et al [19] argue that the representativeness should be consistent with the properties that need to be preserved. Most of sampling approaches only assess the extent to which the sampled subgraph is representative of explicit/simple topological properties (e.g., the degree distribution), but are not adequate for retaining the intrinsic property, i.e., clustering structure, which is prevailing in many real-world graphs under study today [1,10,33,35] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%