2021
DOI: 10.1080/0305215x.2021.1901087
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural multi-objective topology optimization and application based on the criteria importance through intercriteria correlation method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As an objective weighting calculation model, the CRITIC method fully exploits the attributes of the indicator data, takes into account the variability within the indicators and the confict between the indicators to determine the objective weights, and the weighting results are more reliable and reasonable. In the traditional CRITIC method, the variability of indicators is represented by standard deviation, and the larger the standard deviation of data, the stronger the variability is represented and the higher the weight is assigned; the confict of indicators is quantifed by the correlation coefcient, and the larger value of the correlation coefcient between indicators, the smaller the confict, and the more overlapping information the indicators contain, the lower the weight is assigned [34][35][36][37][38].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As an objective weighting calculation model, the CRITIC method fully exploits the attributes of the indicator data, takes into account the variability within the indicators and the confict between the indicators to determine the objective weights, and the weighting results are more reliable and reasonable. In the traditional CRITIC method, the variability of indicators is represented by standard deviation, and the larger the standard deviation of data, the stronger the variability is represented and the higher the weight is assigned; the confict of indicators is quantifed by the correlation coefcient, and the larger value of the correlation coefcient between indicators, the smaller the confict, and the more overlapping information the indicators contain, the lower the weight is assigned [34][35][36][37][38].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is, therefore, interesting to investigate how to develop better weight coefficient combinations. Subjective approaches have the limitation of involving the intervention of a decision-maker [37]. As a result, an objective approach without a decision-maker's subjective interference is needed, especially when there is no subjective preference among objectives [37].…”
Section: Critic Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subjective approaches have the limitation of involving the intervention of a decision-maker [37]. As a result, an objective approach without a decision-maker's subjective interference is needed, especially when there is no subjective preference among objectives [37]. Diakoulakiet al [28] suggested the CRITIC approach as an objective weighing method for obtaining the objective weights of criteria in MCDM problems.…”
Section: Critic Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For empowerment using the CRITIC method [70], to eliminate the effects of the magnitude and the positive and negative signs, the standard deviation coefficient is used instead of the standard deviation, and the correlation coefficient is treated by taking the absolute value [71]. Calculate the amount of information and weight of the jth indicator.…”
Section: Positive Indicatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%