Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) 3 is thought to enter a latent phase (1) to survive hostile environments like starvation and hypoxia (2). During times of duress, transcriptional regulators belonging to the CRP/fumarate and nitrate reduction regulator family respond to a broad spectrum of intracellular and exogenous signals associated with low oxygen stress and starvation, modulating the expression of various metabolic genes in many facultative or strictly anaerobic bacteria (3, 4). In Escherichia coli, CRP controls the expression of over 100 genes in response to changes in the intracellular concentration of cAMP (5). CRP is activated by the binding of cAMP and subsequently becomes an active transcriptional regulator by means of allosteric structural changes (6 -10). Several essential genes are up-regulated during intracellular growth in macrophages (11), suggesting that cAMP signaling may be important to M. tuberculosis during its interaction with the host. Indeed, Rv3676 (Mtb-CRP), the CRP homolog in M. tuberculosis H37Rv, is a cAMP-responsive transcription factor (12-14). Deletion of Rv3676 results in impaired growth in laboratory medium, in bone marrow-derived macrophages, and in tubercle bacillus grown in a mouse model system (13). These observations suggest that Mtb-CRP plays a critical role in Mtb survival, especially in macrophages.Several models have been offered as possible explanations for how the sensory module can transmit the signal to the distant DNA-binding domain (9,(15)(16)(17). Perhaps the most intriguing question about the CRP family is how ligand binding within the effector domain can influence the properties of the DNA-binding domain. Answers to this question remain elusive, in part because the only CRP crystal structure available for Mtb is that of the cAMP-free form (18) The Mtb-CRP apo structure displayed asymmetry between the subunits as compared with the E. coli CRP⅐cAMP crystal structure, which shares only a 32% sequence identity with Mtb-CRP. Although the asymmetry observed in the apoMtb-CRP crystal (18) has been interpreted as an important factor in its mechanism, NMR studies in solution could not find any evidence of structural asymmetry in either the E. coli apoCRP or the cAMP⅐CRP (19 -21). In contrast, recent NMR studies (22) reported cAMP binding resulting in a coil to helix transition that extends the coil-coil dimerization and functions as a regulatory switch. Nevertheless, the allosteric mechanism by which ligand binding induces a conformational transition remains elusive from the same organism and atomic level structural comparisons are needed to fully understand the transition. The atomic coordinates and structure factors (codes 3I54 and 3I59) HTH, helix-turn-helix; r.m.s.d., root mean square deviation; CHES, 2-(cyclohexylamino)ethanesulfonic acid.