The corrected values for the band gaps E g , width of valence p-band W p , and d-band position E d , calculated within the LDA + U approximation for ZnO polymorphs are provided. After our original paper [1] had been published we became aware of an error in the VASP ver. 4.6 routine as implemented in the MedeA software platform [2]. The error affected the way the electronic density of states and band structures were calculated for specific mesh settings.When a patch fixing this error had been released [2] we decided to recalculate all the band structures for the ZnO polymorphs under consideration: B4 (wurzite), B3 (zinc-blende), and B1 (rocksalt) structures, and yet experimentally undiscovered B2 (CsCl) structure in order to obtain the corrected values for the band gaps E g , width of valence p-band W p , and d-band position E d . The corrected calculated dependencies of E g , W p , and E d on the value of the Coulomb interaction U-parameter (U O = U Zn ) for ZnO polymorphs are depicted in Figs. 2-4, respectively. (In order to assist the reader in evaluating our results we keep the same notation of the figures and tables as in our original paper [1]).Comparison of the results presented here with those included in our original paper [1] shows that it is the band structure of the B4 phase that is considerably affected by the above mentioned software error. It is worth to mention that now W p for the B4 phase has a maximum at U O = U Zn = 4 eV and then gradually diminishes towards lower values with increasing U-parameter. For the rest of the ZnO structures considered here the qualitative and quantitative picture is generally maintained with some minor changes in numerical values, except that now W p for the B2 phase is higher for U O = U Zn = 0 eV than for U O = U Zn = 2 eV. However, it is worth to mention that for the B2 phase all the band gaps studied (direct Γ c -Γ v , indirect X c -Γ v and Γ c -M v *, see Fig. 2 for details) are rather insensitive to increasing value of U-parameter, and, moreover, the direct Γ c -Γ v band gap is almost equal to zero, as it was previously reported in our original paper [1].We also explicitly list in this erratum the corrected values for E g , W p , and E d computed for U O = 10 eV and U Zn = 8 eV. The results obtained are summarized in Table 2.