2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.strusafe.2019.101905
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural reliability analysis based on ensemble learning of surrogate models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
35
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Surrogate model-based methods attempt to replace the original performance function (PF) with some computational cheaper models, which are recently heated along with the soaring of machine learnings [25]. Nevertheless, due to the lack of solid mechanical bases, most of the surrogate models, including conventional response surface methods [21], statistical learnings [26], Kriging interpolations [27], support vector machines [28], artificial neuron networks [29] and their hybrids or variations [30][31][32][33], would appear to be too crude when high accuracy of reliability estimation is required, which would be even deteriorated when sharp changes on LSS exist. Compared to methods following the three afore-mentioned three clues, methods emphasize on searching algorithms seem more efficient and accurate, which are realized by regulating the sampling process strategically through some algorithms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Surrogate model-based methods attempt to replace the original performance function (PF) with some computational cheaper models, which are recently heated along with the soaring of machine learnings [25]. Nevertheless, due to the lack of solid mechanical bases, most of the surrogate models, including conventional response surface methods [21], statistical learnings [26], Kriging interpolations [27], support vector machines [28], artificial neuron networks [29] and their hybrids or variations [30][31][32][33], would appear to be too crude when high accuracy of reliability estimation is required, which would be even deteriorated when sharp changes on LSS exist. Compared to methods following the three afore-mentioned three clues, methods emphasize on searching algorithms seem more efficient and accurate, which are realized by regulating the sampling process strategically through some algorithms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the FORM and SORM methods, which are part of the moment methods, are useful in structural engineering problems [10][11][12][13][14][15][16]. A reliability index, which defined as the shortest geometric distance between the origin of standard normal space and the LSF, is presented.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While it is easy to combine FEA with the MCS method to conduct reliability analysis, this method is computationally expensive. In recent years, metamodeling techniques have been developed to overcome this issue, such as the model tree (MT), evolutionary polynomial regression (EPR), multivariate adaptive regression spline (MARS), gene expression programming (GEP) [15], response surface method (RSM) [16][17][18], support vector machine [19,20], kriging surrogate model [21][22][23][24], and ANN [25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32]. Metamodeling techniques are adopted to establish the approximate models, which can replace the original implicit LSF.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%