2020
DOI: 10.1002/qre.2626
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural reliability assessment by salp swarm algorithm–based FORM

Abstract: The first-order reliability method (FORM) is well recognized as an efficient approach for reliability analysis. Rooted in considering the reliability problem as a constrained optimization of a function, the traditional FORM makes use of gradient-based optimization techniques to solve it. However, the gradient-based optimization techniques may result in local convergence or even divergence for the highly nonlinear or high-dimensional performance function. In this paper, a hybrid method combining the Salp Swarm … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared to methods following the three afore-mentioned three clues, methods emphasize on searching algorithms seem more efficient and accurate, which are realized by regulating the sampling process strategically through some algorithms. The family of searching algorithms for structural reliability is board and varied, in which some of the heuristic ones are directional divisions [34][35][36][37], swarm algorithms [38,39], genetic algorithms [40][41][42], gradient or difference-based algorithms [43,44], etc. Yet, further improvements on searching algorithms with respect to the following aspects are always welcomed: 1, maximizing computational efficiency by minimizing the number of redundant samplings; 2, increasing robustness by adapting to a board type range of PFs; 3, stabilization of the convergence rate; 4, customization for different engineering cases according to the requirement of accuracy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to methods following the three afore-mentioned three clues, methods emphasize on searching algorithms seem more efficient and accurate, which are realized by regulating the sampling process strategically through some algorithms. The family of searching algorithms for structural reliability is board and varied, in which some of the heuristic ones are directional divisions [34][35][36][37], swarm algorithms [38,39], genetic algorithms [40][41][42], gradient or difference-based algorithms [43,44], etc. Yet, further improvements on searching algorithms with respect to the following aspects are always welcomed: 1, maximizing computational efficiency by minimizing the number of redundant samplings; 2, increasing robustness by adapting to a board type range of PFs; 3, stabilization of the convergence rate; 4, customization for different engineering cases according to the requirement of accuracy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reliability solving is converted into computing probability distribution of the function composed of these variables. As a classic reliability model, the mathematical expression of probabilistic reliability model is a multi‐integrals as follows 2 : Pfbadbreak=gfalse(xfalse)0fX(x,θx)dx\begin{equation} {P_f} = \mathop \int \limits_{g( x ) \le 0} {f_X}( {x,{\theta _x}} )dx \end{equation}where Pf${P_f}$ represents the probability of failure, x=false(x1,x2,,xnfalse)$x = ( {{x_1},{x_2}, \ldots ,{x_n}} )$ is the basic variable. θx${\theta _x}$ is its distribution parameter, and the random uncertainty of the basic variable is described by the probability density function fX(x,θx)${f_X}( {x,{\theta _x}} )$.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For problems with highly nonlinear limit state function, meta‐heuristic algorithms are often used to solve the FORM. For example, Zhong et al 2,20 . proposed FORM combining Harris Hawks Optimization (HHO‐FORM) 21 and FORM combining Salp Swarm Algorithm (SSA‐FORM) to realize the effective solution of high‐dimensional problems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations