Current Practices and Future Trends in Deep Foundations 2004
DOI: 10.1061/40743(142)10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural Resistance Factors for Drilled Shafts Considering Construction Flaws

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Anomalies greater than 10% of the cross-sectional area will be detected by multiple measuring locations. Anomalies smaller than 10% of cross-sectional area will generally be detected only at the nearest measuring location, but these small anomalies are typically relatively insignificant and the shaft might still be used considering a reduced structural strength (O'Neill and Sarhan, 2004).…”
Section: Figure 2 Thermal Results Showing Cage Offsetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Anomalies greater than 10% of the cross-sectional area will be detected by multiple measuring locations. Anomalies smaller than 10% of cross-sectional area will generally be detected only at the nearest measuring location, but these small anomalies are typically relatively insignificant and the shaft might still be used considering a reduced structural strength (O'Neill and Sarhan, 2004).…”
Section: Figure 2 Thermal Results Showing Cage Offsetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…O' Neill dan Sarhan [9] dalam survei lebih dari 10.000 tiang melaporkan deteksi "cacat" di sekitar 20% hingga 25% dari semua tiang menggunakan berbagai metode Evaluasi Non-Destruktif (NDE) seperti Crosshole Sonic Logging (CSL) atau Gamma Gamma Logging (GGL). Hasil Konsensus menyatakan bahwa metode Crosshole Sonic Logging (CSL) adalah yang terbaik.…”
Section: Gambar 1 Lokasi Jembatan Pulau Balang IIunclassified
“…(3) TDR probe with PVC insulation of thickness 0.64 mm. (4) Dielectric constant was unmeasurable due to conduction loss.…”
Section: Construction Of Model Pilementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, necking defects are occasionally introduced in the bored pile during or after the construction due to soil inclusion, poor concrete stiffness, intrusion of ground water, and slurry, among others [ 3 ]. It has been reported that 20.1% of bored piles are defective [ 4 ]. Thus, pile integrity tests for the detection of necking defects are necessary to ensure the safety of bored piles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%