No definitive biologic function has been associated with the human ABO histoblood group polymorphism, or any other terminal carbohydrate differences within or between closely related species. We have experimentally addressed the question of whether viral particles can become glycosylated as determined by the glycosylation (eg, ABO) status of the producer cell and as a result be affected by human serum containing specific natural antibodies (NAbs). Measles virus was produced in cells transfected with cDNA encoding, either human A-transferase, B-transferase, an inactive "O-transferase," or a pig ␣1-3galactosyltransferase (␣1-3GT) synthesizing the Gal␣1-3Gal structure. The viruses were shown to carry the same ABO structures as the cells; that is, A but not B if produced in A-type cells, and B but not A if produced in B-type cells. Only O was detected on the virus produced from O-type cells, whereas reduced amounts of O appeared on the Aand B-type viral particles. In addition, the Gal␣1-3Gal structure was transferred onto measles only when grown in human cells expressing this structure. When subjected to human preimmune sera, the A-type, the B-type, and the Gal␣1-3Gal viral particles were partially neutralized in a complement-dependent manner. However, the O-type or the Gal␣1-3Gal-negative viral particles were not neutralized. The neutralization appeared to be mediated by specific NAb, as judged by specific inhibition using synthetic A and
IntroductionThe ABO (or ABH) histo-blood group system is characterized by the expression of polymorphic carbohydrate termini on several cell types. The genetic basis for this polymorphism in humans is explained by the existence of allelic forms of a single gene encoding glycosyltransferases with specificity for different monosaccharides. 1 They appear to be evolutionarily old, being present on glycosylated structures in different eukaryotic as well as prokaryotic organisms, and established their present day polymorphic form in humans at the latest during early primate evolution (for a review, see Blancher et al 2 ). Hence, it would be surprising if the ABO structures did not serve an important purpose. No definitive biologic function has, however, as yet been identified, 3 although suggestions have often centered on immunologic explanations. [4][5][6][7] Another very similar terminal carbohydrate structure, the Gal␣1-3Gal1-4GlcNAc-R (referred to as Gal␣1-3Gal) is present in other mammals but not in humans and other Old World primates. 8 Bacteria mimicking vertebrate terminal carbohydrates may have given rise to selection pressures favoring polymorphic glycans. 9 In addition, many pathogens and their toxins bind to specific terminal carbohydrate structures and may consequently produce selection pressures affecting the evolution of terminal carbohydrate structures. 7,10 It has also been previously suggested that viruses may carry ABO structures as part of their envelope 11,12 and consequently serve as potential selective forces influencing ABO genotype frequencies in a population....