1996
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.77.4046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural Transition in Large-Lattice-Mismatch Heteroepitaxy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

10
212
2
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 345 publications
(225 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
10
212
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It turns out that there is a critical 2D island size above which monolayer islands become unstable against bilayer islands. Thus, as has been shown earlier by Stoyanov and Markov,48,6 Priester and Lannoo, 28 and Chen and Washburn, 31 the monolayer islands appear as necessary precursors for the formation of 3D islands. Beyond another critical size the bilayer islands become unstable against trilayer islands, etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 54%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…It turns out that there is a critical 2D island size above which monolayer islands become unstable against bilayer islands. Thus, as has been shown earlier by Stoyanov and Markov,48,6 Priester and Lannoo, 28 and Chen and Washburn, 31 the monolayer islands appear as necessary precursors for the formation of 3D islands. Beyond another critical size the bilayer islands become unstable against trilayer islands, etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…31 The former authors define the critical size by comparing the energy per atom of monolayer islands with that of fully built 3D pyramids. Chen and Washburn have accepted as critical the size at which the energy of the monolayer islands displays a minimum.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Epitaxial growth typically requires a lattice mismatch between the substrate and film below 5% in lattice parameter. 37 From Table 1, we note that the a and c axes provide an interfacial preference between the VO 2 and TiO 2 brookite structures, while the a -b plane would be more favored for homostructural VO 2 growth on TiO 2 columbite and the anatase. We also compared the structural parameters of the A-and B-phases for VO 2 with experimental measurements and found agreement within 2%.…”
Section: Homostructural Epitaxymentioning
confidence: 96%