2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2010.11.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structurally stitched NCF CFRP laminates. Part 2: Finite element unit cell based prediction of in-plane strength

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nowadays composite materials offer the possibility of a weight reduction of a structure without decreasing its mechanical properties. Therefore cost‐efficient technologies for the manufacturing of high‐quality FRCP are of particular interest today .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nowadays composite materials offer the possibility of a weight reduction of a structure without decreasing its mechanical properties. Therefore cost‐efficient technologies for the manufacturing of high‐quality FRCP are of particular interest today .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Increasing the thread diameter and the stitch density leads to a decrease of the in-plane properties combined with an improvement of the CAI strength and the G IR rate. Nevertheless, a proper selection of the stitching confi gurations allows achieving a useful compromise between both effects (Heß and Himmel, 2010b;Heß, 2009). A fi nite element based unit cell model was developed to predict in-plane stiffness and strength properties of unstitched and structurally stitched NCF composites.…”
Section: Conclusion and Future Trendsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14.13 and Fig. 14.14 , the elasticity and strength prediction is outlined, while for more detailed information, including the mathematical formalisms, the reader is referred to Heß and Himmel (2010b). The parametric model is capable of generating complex unit cells considering the number, thickness and fi bre orientation of the laminate layers, the cross-section and width of voids generated by the structural stitching, the stitch spacing, pitch length and stitching direction as well as the loading direction.…”
Section: Unit Cell Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tserpes et al and Yavari et al developed models in which the knitting yarn was represented by beam elements, thus the SYD characteristic was not represented in their models. While in the models reported by Heß et al and Mikhaluk et al , the knitting yarn diameter and the resin pocket were involved but the structure of the knitting yarn were omitted.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%