Structure, Action, and Outcomes: The Dynamics of Power in Social Exchange

Abstract

JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org. This content downloaded from 132.210.236.20 on Sat, 11 Apr 2015 16:36:48 UTC All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

The dynamics of networked power in a concentrated business network

“…Some see power as something that can be held as a property of an entity (Pfeffer, 1981). Studies adopting this view look at sources of personal power as part of a structural context (Brass, 1984;Burkhardt and Brass, 1990;Emerson, 1962Emerson, , 1972Krackhardt, 1990;Molm, 1990;Wrong, 1968).…”

Exclusion and Power: A Test of Four Theories of Power in Exchange Networks

“…That is, the determinants of power, as revealed through "exchange outcomes of power use" (Molm 1990), are actors' structural locations rather than their strategic actions.4 The key theoretical problem is identifying the structurally advantaged positions in a network, i.e., the positions that will exercise greater power in exchange relations.…”

“…4 Strategic action refers to how subjects use their potential power advantages. Although strategic action can affect the use of power, Molm (1990) showed that strategic action is unrelated to structural advantage. tual payoffs to a particular position in the core outcomes can vary widely.…”

"Stamps of Power and Conflict: Imprinting and Influence in the U.S. Senate, 1973-2009"

“…One reason is that having more power enables people to reduce their dependence on others for valued resources (Cook and Emerson 1984;Molm 1990). For example, Zajac and Westphal (1996) found that boards of directors with greater structural power had greater independence and could therefore influence CEO succession choices in the direction of their own demographic profile.…”