2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2005.07.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structure and dynamics of a clonal plant population: Classical model results in a non-classic formulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
10
1
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
10
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast to our former Calamagrostis projects (Ulanova et al, 2002(Ulanova et al, , 2008Logofet et al, 2006;Logofet, 2008Logofet, , 2013c, there exists a reproduction link (g 2 2 ! g 1 1 in Fig.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In contrast to our former Calamagrostis projects (Ulanova et al, 2002(Ulanova et al, , 2008Logofet et al, 2006;Logofet, 2008Logofet, , 2013c, there exists a reproduction link (g 2 2 ! g 1 1 in Fig.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 55%
“…The kind of data we have been dealing with in a number of Calamagrostis case studies (Ulanova et al, 2002(Ulanova et al, , 2008Logofet et al, 2006;Logofet, 2013c) was called 'identified individuals' by Caswell (2001, p. 134). When a woodreed population grows fast due to vegetative propagation, the age-stage status of each individual plant (in a sample plot) can be determined (with the changes monitored over successive years) reliably from the morphology of its above-ground part, but the pointer to its parent plant (the rhizome that the individual plant has developed from) is reliably hidden beneath.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Structural differences during ontogenetic development in different plant groups involve the presence/absence of cotyledons, ramification patterns, stem type, stipe, reproductive structures, and the root system (Souza et al 2000(Souza et al , 2003Lienert & Fischer 2003;Logofet et al 2006;Miranda--Melo et al 2007;Bernacci et al 2008;Fidelis et al 2008;Schmucki & de Blois 2009). Morphological changes during ontogenetic development can be evaluated through the study of plant architecture (Bell 1991;Barthélémy & Caraglio 2007), which describes the inherited branching pattern of species, such as their characteristics related to the direction of growth, activity in time and destiny (Barthélémy & Caraglio 2007;León Enriquez et al 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The allometric relationship between height and stem diameter indicates the amount of support that the plant requires within given environmental conditions (Claussen & Maycock 1995). Morphometric characteristics include total height; stem diameter; number and size of the leaves; rosette diameter; and number of branches (Souza et al 2000(Souza et al , 2003Lienert & Fischer 2003;Logofet et al 2006;Miranda-Melo et al 2007;Bernacci et al 2008;Fidelis et al 2008;Schmucki & de Blois 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Следует отметить, что динамика метапопуляции описывается обобщенной системой из связанных систем отображений, если ее локальные популяции имеют сложное внутреннее устройство, например, состоят из нескольких возрастных классов [1,3,4,6,16]. В этом случае локальной динамике соответствует система отображений, учитывающая особенности субпопуляции, а миграционная связь описывается путем добавления аддитивных членов к правым частям уравнений [5,17].…”
unclassified