2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecss.2008.05.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structure and functioning of Mediterranean lagoon fish assemblages: A key for the identification of water body types

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

6
57
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
6
57
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Franco et al (2008) showed that fi sh assemblages from 19 northern Mediterranean lagoons Table 1 for species labels were dominated in general by marine species and detritivorous and omnivorous fi sh. However such difference in ecological guild may result from the relatively harsher and variable conditions in northern lagoons excluding many marine fi sh, especially marine stenohaline species, from permanent residency in these systems as suggested by McLusky and Elliott (2004) for estuarine species.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Franco et al (2008) showed that fi sh assemblages from 19 northern Mediterranean lagoons Table 1 for species labels were dominated in general by marine species and detritivorous and omnivorous fi sh. However such difference in ecological guild may result from the relatively harsher and variable conditions in northern lagoons excluding many marine fi sh, especially marine stenohaline species, from permanent residency in these systems as suggested by McLusky and Elliott (2004) for estuarine species.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Franco et al (2008) Table 1 for species labels were dominated in general by marine species and detritivorous and omnivorous fi sh. However such difference in ecological guild may result from the relatively harsher and variable conditions in northern lagoons excluding many marine fi sh, especially marine stenohaline species, from permanent residency in these systems as suggested by McLusky and Elliott (2004) for estuarine species.The connection with the sea (mouth confi guration: width and area) was showed to be an important factor related to the number of fi sh species in a lagoon (Perez-Ruzafa et al 2007, Franco et al 2008. The short distance from the marine inlets may explain the higher abundance and total number of species recorded in group 1, being consistent with the observation that the short distance from the marine inlets tends to increase the fi sh biodiversity and abundance (Gordo and Cabral 2001, Malavasi et al.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(ELLIOTT et al, 2007). Using a traditional taxonomic approach, along with an analysis of FG, represents a holistic approach to describing the structure of fish fauna (FRANCO et al, 2008). Moreover, because functional aspects provide important cues regarding ecosystem health, this approach may help in decisionmaking processes related to the management of estuarine areas (MATHIESON et al, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The determination of FG has been widely used to describe the structure of estuarine fish assemblages by grouping fish species according to their trophic level, reproduction strategy and use of the estuary (GARRISON; LINK, 2000;ANGEL;OJEDA, 2001;LOBRY et al, 2003;BOUCHEREAU, 2004;ELLIOTT et al, 2007;FRANCO et al, 2008;SELLESLAGH et al, 2009). Diversity in life cycle, habitat use and trophic position among fishes is expected to affect the functioning of the ecosystem; thus examining these factors is useful for understanding how an ecosystem functions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the knowledge on the structure and functioning variability of the guilds in transitional water is useful for identifying different water body types for which specific biological reference conditions can be reliably derived (Franco et al 2008b). In addition, the structure of a community's trophic guilds may be considered as a good indicator of trophic integrity (Deegan et al 1997, Elliott et al 2007, Henriques et al 2008 and is widely adopted in current indices, because it allows a direct functional approach to the estuarine assessment (Pérez-Domínguez et al 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%