2012
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.86.022716
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structure and interactions of ultracold Yb ions and Rb atoms

Abstract: In order to study ultracold charge-transfer processes in hybrid atom-ion traps, we have mapped out the potential-energy curves and molecular parameters for several low-lying states of the Rb, Yb+ system. We employ both a multireference configuration interaction and a full configuration interaction (FCI) approach. Turning points, crossing points, potential minima, and spectroscopic molecular constants are obtained for the lowest five molecular states. Long-range parameters, including the dispersion coefficients… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
25
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
4
25
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The dissociation energy of Sayfutyarova et al [32] is 3496 cm −1 (0.4334 eV), almost twice the value of Lamb and co-workers [22], who obtained a value of 0.2202 eV. We note also that the equilibrium distance R e also occurs at a shorter bond length of 8.088a 0 [32], compared to our finding which gave R e = 9.031a 0 [22]. Fig.…”
Section: Electronic Structure Calculationsupporting
confidence: 60%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The dissociation energy of Sayfutyarova et al [32] is 3496 cm −1 (0.4334 eV), almost twice the value of Lamb and co-workers [22], who obtained a value of 0.2202 eV. We note also that the equilibrium distance R e also occurs at a shorter bond length of 8.088a 0 [32], compared to our finding which gave R e = 9.031a 0 [22]. Fig.…”
Section: Electronic Structure Calculationsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…Low lying potential energy curves (PEC's) as a function of internuclear distance out to R = 50a.u. are computed and in the present investigation we extend our earlier work [22] to calculate the transition dipole moments between the 1,3 Σ + states. As in our previous work we use an active two-electron model within a multi-reference configuration interaction (MRCI) and a full-configuration interaction (FCI) framework to calculate all the potentials.…”
Section: Electronic Structure Calculationmentioning
confidence: 52%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This discrepancy of 113 cm −1 also holds for the spacing between the Yb + ( s 6 )+(Alk)(ns) and the Yb( s S 6 2 1 )+(Alk) + asymptotes (equal to 16864.8 cm −1 in our method, in good agreement with the experimental value of 16752.2 cm −1 [64]). It favorably compares to the discrepancy of 322 cm −1 reported in [66], and to [67] which reported an energy difference of 16279 cm −1 between these two asymptotes. Finally, in their work on LiYb + [13] the authors report an ionization energy for the Yb ground state of 50267 cm −1 .…”
Section: Electronic Structure Calculations For (Alk-alke) + Molecularsupporting
confidence: 50%
“…As already quoted above, the cases of RbYb + and LiYb + are peculiar, as the Yb + ion and Yb atom have not been treated with a large ECP before. Tables 1 and 2 reveal a contrasted situation for RbYb + in comparison with the results of [66,67,74] that are all obtained with similar approaches based on small core ECPs. Our values for R e and D e of the X PEC are in good agreement with those of [67], while the potential well depth from [66,74] is twice smaller than ours, with a minimum located at a significantly larger distance.…”
Section: Electronic Structure Calculations For (Alk-alke) + Molecularmentioning
confidence: 62%