2016
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpca.6b02230
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structure and Stability Studies of Pharmacologically RelevantS-Nitrosothiols: A Theoretical Approach

Abstract: Nowadays, S-nitrosothiols (RSNOs) represent a promising class of nitric oxide (NO) donors that could be successfully used as drugs to compensate the decrease of NO production that usually arises in conjunction with cardiovascular diseases. Nevertheless, notwithstanding their pharmacological interest, the structure-stability relationship in RSNOs is still unclear, and this issue, together with the mechanism of NO donation in the physiological medium, deserves further investigation. As a first step forward in th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
17
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
2
17
1
Order By: Relevance
“…21,95,97,99 The antagonistic paradigm also provides a useful framework for designing novel RSNO reactions 97 as well as RSNOs with desired properties. 19,34,98 The accurate FPD data on the CH 3 SNO structure reported here are consistent with the antagonistic model. Compared to HSNO, the S-N bond is ~0.03 Å shorter (1.814 Å vs 1.842 Å in cis-CH 3 SNO and cis-HSNO, respectively) and 2.7 kcal/mol stronger (D 0 is 32.4 vs 29.7 in cis-CH 3 SNO and trans-HSNO), and the rotation barrier is ~3 kcal/mol higher (E 0 ≠ is 12.7 vs.…”
Section: Antagonistic Nature Of Ch 3 Snosupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…21,95,97,99 The antagonistic paradigm also provides a useful framework for designing novel RSNO reactions 97 as well as RSNOs with desired properties. 19,34,98 The accurate FPD data on the CH 3 SNO structure reported here are consistent with the antagonistic model. Compared to HSNO, the S-N bond is ~0.03 Å shorter (1.814 Å vs 1.842 Å in cis-CH 3 SNO and cis-HSNO, respectively) and 2.7 kcal/mol stronger (D 0 is 32.4 vs 29.7 in cis-CH 3 SNO and trans-HSNO), and the rotation barrier is ~3 kcal/mol higher (E 0 ≠ is 12.7 vs.…”
Section: Antagonistic Nature Of Ch 3 Snosupporting
confidence: 84%
“…It elegantly accounts for the extreme malleability of the S-N bond in the presence of charged or neutral Lewis acids and bases, 20,96,97 provides chemically intuitive description of subtle substituent effects in RSNOs, 19,34,98 and explains the ability of RSNOs to engage in two competing reaction modes with the same molecule. 21,95,97,99 The antagonistic paradigm also provides a useful framework for designing novel RSNO reactions 97 as well as RSNOs with desired properties.…”
Section: Antagonistic Nature Of Ch 3 Snomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The nature of the R determines R-SNO chemistry, as R-SNOs vary in their stability 50,51 . CysNO (nitrosocysteine) structure exhibits different characteristics than HSNO (thionitrous acid, the smallest possible R-SNO); S-nitrosoglutathione (GSNO), slightly larger, is more stable 52,53 . S-nitrosothiols can transnitrosylate thiol-containing amino acids, peptides, or proteins by releasing NO + or NO -, more rapidly than they can spontaneous release NO 13 .…”
Section: Nitrosothiols: Nitrosylation Substrates and Donorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In vivo, S-nitrosothiols like S-nitrosoalbumin, S-ni trosohemoglobin and S-nitrosoglutathione (GSNO) are the physiological forms of NO storage and transport [8]. Indeed, the formation of the S-NO bond extends NO half-life from 45 min up to several hours [9][10] and limits the oxidative/nitrosative stress induced by NO oxidation into peroxynitrite ions (ONOO -) [11]. Despite the therapeutic potential of S-nitrosothiols, their half-life linked to their physico-chemical instability (heat, light, metallic cations,…) and/or enzymatic (redoxines or, for GSNO only, γ-glutamyltransferase) degradation, is too short for chronic diseases treatment [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%