2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.mib.2021.03.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structure-based design of novel polyhedral protein nanomaterials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We designed the JUPITER curriculum to address an ongoing scientific challenge: improving the success rate of current computational methods for the de novo design of self-assembling protein complexes using the Rosetta software suite. [22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34] These methods focus on docking oligomeric protein building blocks into target symmetric architectures (e.g., icosahedral point group symmetry), followed by protein-protein interface design to generate low-energy interfaces between the building blocks that drive assembly specifically to the target structure. While such assemblies are well-suited for molecular encapsulation or display applications such as cellular delivery and vaccine development, [34][35][36][37][38][39] current computational models do not allow us to confidently predict the success or stability of design models.…”
Section: Program Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We designed the JUPITER curriculum to address an ongoing scientific challenge: improving the success rate of current computational methods for the de novo design of self-assembling protein complexes using the Rosetta software suite. [22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34] These methods focus on docking oligomeric protein building blocks into target symmetric architectures (e.g., icosahedral point group symmetry), followed by protein-protein interface design to generate low-energy interfaces between the building blocks that drive assembly specifically to the target structure. While such assemblies are well-suited for molecular encapsulation or display applications such as cellular delivery and vaccine development, [34][35][36][37][38][39] current computational models do not allow us to confidently predict the success or stability of design models.…”
Section: Program Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34] These methods focus on docking oligomeric protein building blocks into target symmetric architectures (e.g., icosahedral point group symmetry), followed by protein-protein interface design to generate low-energy interfaces between the building blocks that drive assembly specifically to the target structure. While such assemblies are well-suited for molecular encapsulation or display applications such as cellular delivery and vaccine development, [34][35][36][37][38][39] current computational models do not allow us to confidently predict the success or stability of design models. Indeed, many designs aggregate or fail to assemble, due to misfolding or suboptimal assembly conditions.…”
Section: Program Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A promising approach to this issue is the use of templates based on self-assembling biological materials, such as nucleic acids and proteins [ 3 4 ]. Biological scaffolds can be programmed through predictable chemical interactions, such as DNA base pairing, disulfide bond formation, and metal coordination, to form complex, well-defined nanostructures [ 5 6 ]. Viruses and virus-like particles (VLPs) possess many advantageous properties for biotemplating applications [ 7 8 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Native self-assembling PNPs are natural structures (ferritins, small heat shock proteins, vaults, encapsulins and lumazine synthase) that perform biological roles in living cells [14][15][16][17]; and virus-like particles (VLP) of which prominent examples are cowpea chlorotic mottle virus (CCMV), bacteriophage MS2, hepatitis B virus (HBV), bacteriophage P22 and many others [18]. De novo designed PNPs such as those developed by the Baker [19,20], Yeates [21] and King [22] groups are also self-assembling nanocages but they are developed by computational programming and simulations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%