2015
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.15-16943
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structure–Function Relationship in Glaucoma Using Ganglion Cell–Inner Plexiform Layer Thickness Measurements

Abstract: Significant structure-function associations were found between GCIPL thickness measurements at the macula and the functional loss measured on 10-2 SAP in glaucoma. Best fit was found for the inferior and average GCIPL sector thickness. The linear model was useful to study the structure-function relationship.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
23
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
2
23
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…To be fair, there is some evidence that the linear relationship breaks down in the macula and that structural OCT damage may be seen before VF changes (Raza et al, 2011; Rao et al, 2015; Swanson et al, 2004). However, these studies are hard to interpret as various factors contribute to the variability in these data.…”
Section: Understanding Patterns Of Vf Defects Based Upon Cprnfl Damentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To be fair, there is some evidence that the linear relationship breaks down in the macula and that structural OCT damage may be seen before VF changes (Raza et al, 2011; Rao et al, 2015; Swanson et al, 2004). However, these studies are hard to interpret as various factors contribute to the variability in these data.…”
Section: Understanding Patterns Of Vf Defects Based Upon Cprnfl Damentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rao et al reported a significant structure–function relationship between GCIPL thickness and 10-2 standard automated perimetry (SAP), though the strength of the coefficient of determination (r 2 ) was rather moderate (range, 0.16–0.60), depending on the thickness parameters and the VF sensitivity scale. Their results demonstrated that, according to the linear model, the best fit was for the inferior and average GCIPL thicknesses 36. In a different study, the structure–function relationship at the temporal parafoveal location was significantly greater than that at the central or nasal parafoveal location, and greater in the inferior hemimacula than in the superior hemimacula 37.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…[9][10][11][12][13][14] More recently, the development of optical coherence tomography (OCT) has allowed large-scale investigations to be conducted by utilizing thickness profile of various retinal structures such as nerve fiber layer and ganglion cell/inner plexiform layer as an in vivo surrogate measure of GC density, [16][17][18][19] including models for estimating the GC counts in vivo from ganglion cell layer (GCL) thickness. 20,21 The white-on-white Goldmann size III stimulus (GIII) is widely accepted as the standard stimulus size for clinical and scientific measurement of differential light sensitivity (DLS).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the choice of this stimulus size is based on historical rather than psychophysical origins, 4,15,22 it has been utilized in numerous structure-function investigations. [10][11][12][13][14]16,17 One such study by Swanson et al 13 modeled structure-function relationships between DLS measured with GIII and histologically derived GC count per stimulus area (GCc; modulated by retinal eccentricity) on a log-log plot as a two-stage linear regression with a distinct ''tipping point. '' The presence of the ''tipping point'' and two different linear regressions is likely a consequence of spatial summation characteristic altering with eccentricity as a result of critical summation area (Ac) enlarging with eccentricity [23][24][25] while the stimulus size remains fixed.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%