1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0169-328x(97)00256-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structure–function relationship of different domains of the rat corticotropin-releasing factor receptor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

7
46
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
7
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This has been suggested, for example, for the interaction of a soluble portion of CCR5 with gp 120 (47), for which the affinity is reduced by a factor of 10 3 -10 4 . Consistent with our data, another study of a soluble ECD-1 of CRFR1 expressed in E. coli reported only low affinity binding to ovine CRF (43). The fact that both sauvagine and r/hCRF do not compete with astressin for binding to the bNT-CRFR1 may be due to the fact that binding of these two agonists requires coupling of the receptor to G-proteins.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This has been suggested, for example, for the interaction of a soluble portion of CCR5 with gp 120 (47), for which the affinity is reduced by a factor of 10 3 -10 4 . Consistent with our data, another study of a soluble ECD-1 of CRFR1 expressed in E. coli reported only low affinity binding to ovine CRF (43). The fact that both sauvagine and r/hCRF do not compete with astressin for binding to the bNT-CRFR1 may be due to the fact that binding of these two agonists requires coupling of the receptor to G-proteins.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Using mutational analyses, residues that affect binding of peptide or non-peptide antagonists as well as the selectivity of various CRF agonists have been identified in the extracellular and transmembrane domains of CRF receptors (22)(23)(24)(25)(41)(42)(43). All of the extracellular domains contribute, in some degree, to the binding of the CRF peptide ligands.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the species of 52, 60 and 70 kDa likely represent glycosylated forms of CRF1 (α and/or c), while the 80-85 kDa protein might represent a dimer, in agreement with reports of varying CRF1 mobility on SDS-PAGE (Grigoriadis, De Souza, 1988;Grigoriadis, De Souza, 1989;Ruhmann et al, 1996;Hauger et al, 2000;Slominski et al, 2006a;Slominski et al, 2006b). In fact, glycosylated forms of CRF1 of 70 kDa and 53 kDa were respectively detected in pituitary and brain tissues and skin cells (Grigoriadis, De Souza, 1988;Grigoriadis, De Souza, 1989;Slominski et al, 2006a), whereas multiple CRF1 bands were detected in the AtT20 and Y-79 cell lines, and in rat pituitary and human skin cells (Sydow et al, 1997;Slominski et al, 2006a;Slominski et al, 2006b). As regards bands of lower MW (37 and 40 kDa), these could represent products of proteolytic processing of CRF1.…”
Section: Detection Of Crf1 Proteins In Cos-7 Cellssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…It was demonstrated by CD that ␣-helical structures of h͞rCRF and ␣-hel-CRF 9-41 are involved in binding to CRFBP (32). In view of the crucial role of Ala 22 for binding to CRFBP, we concluded that the hydrophobic patch may be important for binding to CRFBP. Consistently, Ala 24 located on The relative hydrophobicities were taken from the consensus hydrophobicity scale of Eisenberg (24).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…This interaction may have been disturbed by the charged bulky Glu residue in [Glu 22 ]h͞ rCRF as indicated by its lower affinity, whereas it may have been facilitated in [Ala 21 ]Svg as demonstrated by the latter peptide's high affinity to CRFBP. This view is consistent with the observation that replacement of Thr 22 of oCRF by an Ala residue enhanced the affinity by one order of magnitude (12).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%